Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy or surgery for operable early non-small cell lung cancer patients: bound hand and foot to evidence

Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy or surgery for operable early non-small cell lung cancer patients: bound hand and foot to evidence

Antonin Levy1,2,3, Olaf Mercier2,4, Cécile Le Péchoux1

1Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut d’Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; 2Univ Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; 3INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; 4Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery and Heart-Lung Transplantation, Institut d’Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Marie-Lannelongue Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Le Plessis Robinson, France

Correspondence to: Antonin Levy, MD. Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut d’Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France. Email:

Provenance: This is an invited Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Min Zhang (The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China).

Comment on: Deng HY, Wang YC, Ni PZ, et al. Radiotherapy, lobectomy or sublobar resection? A meta-analysis of the choices for treating stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:203-10.

Submitted Feb 06, 2017. Accepted for publication Feb 06, 2017.

doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.25

Surgery is the standard treatment for operable early stage (stage I: T1–T2N0M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Lobectomy, the surgical resection of a single lobe, is generally accepted as the standard procedure, since sublobar resection has not proved to provide equivalent results yet (1). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is becoming the gold standard surgical approach compared to open thoracotomy, as there is no difference in outcomes (2,3). Importantly, a systematic lymph node dissection should be performed in all cases to ensure complete resection. The 5-year overall survival (OS) is 47–51% in patients with clinical stage IA–IB, and 58–73% in surgically staged IA–IB patients, respectively (4). The incidence of local recurrence ranged from 7–23% in large surgical retrospective studies (5,6).

Within the recent years, stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) [or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)] has become the standard of care in non-operable early stage NSCLC patients. SABR is an external beam radiation therapy method used to very precisely deliver a high dose of radiation to an extracranial target within the body, using either a single dose or a small number of fractions. Given that this technique demonstrated high local control rate (85–95%), and a low toxicity profile (7), SABR has been experimentally proposed to a limited number of operable patients with encouraging results (8-10).

Several retrospective studies (overviews, matched-pair analyses and meta-analysis based on the literature) have tried to compare surgery and SABR with conflicting results. This is not surprising given that non-comparable patients have been included. SABR patients were generally inoperable, with higher comorbidities scores (11-14). Death, in the SABR population, is mostly due to intercurrent causes, and OS may then not be considered as a valid comparison endpoint (15). It is also likely that SABR and surgical populations itself were heterogeneous. Surgical procedures differed in reported series (wedge resection, segmentectomy, lobectomy, VATS or open surgery). Several critical factors for local control in SABR patients (mainly the tumor volume and the dose of irradiation) have been highlighted and varied widely in different protocols (16). The definition of the local relapse (within the planned target volume (PTV) or within the lobe), the prescription criteria (at the isocenter or at an encompassed isodose), and procedures for diagnosing relapses are others parameters that largely differ in series, thereby making comparisons more difficult. Finally, the absence of accurate node sampling prior to treatment in SABR patients may lead to a clinical under-staging. Retrospectives series have yet showed that occult node metastasis can occur in 5–10% of selected stage IA NSCLC (17).

As an example, the last recently published meta-analysis by Deng et al. meets the previously described criteria. Selected retrospective studies integrated non-comparable (SABR vs. surgery) patients with mixed populations. Inoperable SABR patients had poorer conditions (older, higher comorbidities scores, and poorer respiratory tests results) than surgical patients, leading to decreased OS. Surgical and SABR technical procedures varied broadly and/or were not reported (12,18,19). In conclusion, existing retrospective data, including meta-analysis on the literature, should be interpreted with extreme caution (11-14).

There is few (mainly two small non-randomized phase II) available, but promising, prospective data on SABR in operable patients. In the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) study 0403, SABR (48 Gy in 4 fractions) was delivered in 65/169 (38%) operable patients with histologically or cytologically proven peripheral cT1N0M0 NSCLC. The 3-year OS, progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, and event-free survival rates were 76.5%, 68.6%, 54.5%, and 51.4%, respectively. The most frequent failure was distant metastases in 21 (33%) cases, followed by 16 (25%) regional lymph node failures (20). In the preliminary results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0618 phase II trial including 26 evaluable patients, the total prescribed SABR dose was 54 Gy delivered in 3 fractions. The 2-year estimates of local failure (primary tumor plus involved lobe failure), regional failure, and distant failures rates were 19.2%, 11.7%, and 15.4%, respectively (21).

Three randomized trials have failed to compare SABR to surgery in operable patients due to poor accrual (ACOSOG Z4099, ROSEL and STARS trials). Data from prematurely terminated STARS and ROSEL studies were pooled but the analysis of the included 58 patients could at best be hypothesis generating (10). New comparative randomized studies are ongoing such as POSTILV (NCT01753414), SABRtooth (NCT02629458), STABLE-MATES (NCT02468024; two later studies including borderline operable patients), and the Veterans Affairs VALOR (NCT02984761, active but not yet recruiting). Only such prospective randomized studies, including quality of life and cost analyses, will really be able to conclude if SABR should be proposed in operable early-stage NSCLC patients.




Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:615-22; discussion 622-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2553-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Falcoz PE, Puyraveau M, Thomas PA, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeon database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:602-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:706-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Kelsey CR, Marks LB, Hollis D, et al. Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: an 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer 2009;115:5218-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Martini N, Bains MS, Burt ME, et al. Incidence of local recurrence and second primary tumors in resected stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:120-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Vansteenkiste J, Crinò L, Dooms C, et al. 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer: early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer consensus on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014;25:1462-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Onishi H, Shioyama Y, Matsumoto Y, et al. Japanese Multi-institutional Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for 661 Medically Operable Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015;93:S187. [Crossref]
  9. Lagerwaard FJ, Verstegen NE, Haasbeek CJ, et al. Outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with potentially operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:348-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:630-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Soldà F, Lodge M, Ashley S, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer; systematic review and comparison with a surgical cohort. Radiother Oncol 2013;109:1-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Deng HY, Wang YC, Ni PZ, et al. Radiotherapy, lobectomy or sublobar resection? A meta-analysis of the choices for treating stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:203-10. [PubMed]
  13. Zhang B, Zhu F, Ma X, et al. Matched-pair comparisons of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus surgery for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2014;112:250-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Zheng X, Schipper M, Kidwell K, et al. Survival outcome after stereotactic body radiation therapy and surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90:603-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Levy A, Guckenberger M, Hurkmans C, et al. SBRT Dose and Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: In Regard to Koshy et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015;92:945-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Loganadane G, Martinetti F, Mercier O, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A critical literature review of predictive factors of relapse. Cancer Treat Rev 2016;50:240-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Marulli G, Mammana M, Rea F. Impact of lymph node occult metastases in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): what is the evidence? J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E809-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Matsuo Y, Chen F, Hamaji M, et al. Comparison of long-term survival outcomes between stereotactic body radiotherapy and sublobar resection for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in patients at high risk for lobectomy: A propensity score matching analysis. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:2932-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Crabtree TD, Puri V, Robinson C, et al. Analysis of first recurrence and survival in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgical resection or stereotactic radiation therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:1183-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Nagata Y, Hiraoka M, Shibata T, et al. A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Operable T1N0M0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG0403). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;78:S27-8. [Crossref]
  21. Timmerman RD, Paulus R, Pass HI, et al. RTOG 0618: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat operable early-stage lung cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2013,abstr 7523.
Cite this article as: Levy A, Mercier O, Le Péchoux C. Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy or surgery for operable early non-small cell lung cancer patients: bound hand and foot to evidence. J Thorac Dis 2017;9(3):482-484. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.25