Extending the survival advantage of ground glass
Editorial

Extending the survival advantage of ground glass

Fred Lee, Bryan M. Burt

Division of Thoracic Surgery, the Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

Correspondence to: Bryan M. Burt, MD. One Baylor Plaza, BCM 390, Department of Surgery, Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77005, USA. Email: bryan.burt@bcm.edu.

Provenance: This is an invited Editorial commissioned by Section Editor Dr. Jie Dai (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China).

Comment on: Shin KW, Cho S, Chung JH, et al. Comparison of Prognosis of Solid and Part-Solid Node-Negative Adenocarcinoma With the Same Invasive Component Size. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:1654-60.


Submitted Jun 14, 2017. Accepted for publication Jun 14, 2017.

doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.83


The ground glass opacity (GGO) is a radiographic finding that has become an increasingly informative component of lung adenocarcinomas (1). In 2011, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) proposed a revised classification system for lung adenocarcinoma (2). A major contribution of this system was the parsing of lung adenocarcinomas into prognostic categories based upon the extent of pathologic tumor invasion. In this system, a lepidic growth pattern is described which represent non-invasive growth restricted to neoplastic cells along pre-existing alveolar structures, and this pathologic finding correlates the GGO component on fine-section CT. Reciprocally, invasive tumor histology, represented by a proliferation of invasive tumor cells and collapse of the alveolar wall, correlates with a solid appearance on thin-section CT. In other words, the ground glass components of a part-solid lesion on thin-section CT correspond to the preinvasive components of lung adenocarcinomas on pathologic evaluation, and the solid radiographic components indicate invasive pathology (3-9). The prognostic implications of GGOs have been extensively studied by our Asian colleagues, and these findings have been reproduced and verified in largely non-Asian cohorts (10,11). In general, the greater the extent of radiographic ground glass, the better the overall and recurrence free survival; and the greater the size of the solid component, the worse the overall and recurrence free survival.

These findings have obvious implications for lung cancer staging and have been recognized in the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer’s staging system. In this system, the maximum dimension of the solid component (on imaging, c-stage) or the invasive component (on microscopy, p-stage) is used to assign the T category (12). In a recent publication by Shin et al. (13), the authors’ data highlight the requirement to consider size of the invasive component in the pathologic staging of lung adenocarcinoma. A retrospective analysis of the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital lung cancer database for patients with node-negative lung adenocarcinoma was performed to evaluate the prognosis of pathologically solid adenocarcinomas sized less than 20 mm alongside part-solid adenocarcinomas with an invasive tumor size of less than 20 mm. From 2004 to 2012, 191 patients were categorized either as those with a solid adenocarcinoma consisting only of an invasive component (n=92), or those with part-solid adenocarcinomas consisting of both an in situ and invasive component (n=99), and the mean size of the invasive component was similar in both groups (15.9 and 15.2 mm, respectively). Despite the mean total lesion size being larger in the part-solid group (21.0 versus 15.2 mm), 5-year recurrence free survival was statistically improved compared with the solid group (93.7% versus 84.0%). Five-year overall survival was 93.8% in the part solid group, compared to 90.3% in the solid group and this was not statistically different. Lymphovascular invasion and high maximum standardized uptake values (SUV) were significantly more common in the solid group and these two variables were the only independent prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival in multivariate analysis incorporating all patients in both groups.

Whereas a number of studies have demonstrated that the diameter of the solid component is more accurate in guiding prognosis than total tumor size (10,14), the manuscript by Shin et al. take these findings one step further by demonstrating additional insight into tumor biology: despite similar size of invasive components, the addition of an in situ (preinvasive) component identifies lung adenocarcinomas with more favorable prognosis. For example, a patient with a 30 mm part-solid adenocarcinoma with a 15 mm solid component would be expected to have a better prognosis than a patient with a 15 mm solid adenocarcinoma. These findings are likely translatable to clinical staging (based on radiographic GGO components), as was suggested by the findings of Tsutani et al. These authors observed that the radiographic solid portion size was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, while whole tumor size was not, and importantly these authors also demonstrated that solid tumors have more malignant potential than part-solid tumors even when they have the same sized solid component on CT (9,15). Taken together, these data suggest that the presence of in situ carcinoma components pathologically, or ground glass components radiographically, represent lung adenocarcinomas with unique biologic characteristics. Such data drive home the point that not all T1 adenocarcinoma lesions identified on CT are created equal.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Sepesi B, Walsh GL. Surgical therapy of ground-glass opacities. Semin Diagn Pathol 2014;31:289-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:244-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Takahashi M, Shigematsu Y, Ohta M, et al. Tumor invasiveness as defined by the newly proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification has prognostic significance for pathologic stage IA lung adenocarcinoma and can be predicted by radiologic parameters. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:54-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T, et al. A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:751-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma: executive summary. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2011;8:381-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Austin JH, Garg K, Aberle D, et al. Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Radiology 2013;266:62-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Saito H, Kameda Y, Masui K, et al. Correlations between thin-section CT findings, histopathological and clinical findings of small pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Lung Cancer 2011;71:137-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, et al. Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. Radiographics 2007;27:391-408. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, et al. Prognostic significance of using solid versus whole tumor size on high-resolution computed tomography for predicting pathologic malignant grade of tumors in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:607-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Burt BM, Leung AN, Yanagawa M, et al. Diameter of Solid Tumor Component Alone Should be Used to Establish T Stage in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22 Suppl 3:S1318-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Gu B, Burt BM, Merritt RE, et al. A dominant adenocarcinoma with multifocal ground glass lesions does not behave as advanced disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:411-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Kim AW, et al. The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification. Chest 2017;151:193-203.
  13. Shin KW, Cho S, Chung JH, et al. Comparison of Prognosis of Solid and Part-Solid Node-Negative Adenocarcinoma With the Same Invasive Component Size. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:1654-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Murakawa T, Konoeda C, Ito T, et al. The ground glass opacity component can be eliminated from the T-factor assessment of lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:925-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Yamanaka T, et al. Solid tumors versus mixed tumors with a ground-glass opacity component in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic comparison using high-resolution computed tomography findings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:17-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Lee F, Burt BM. Extending the survival advantage of ground glass. J Thorac Dis 2017;9(7):1828-1830. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.83