Thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Original Article

Thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Fei Cui1,2*, Jun Liu1,2*, Wenlong Shao1,2, Jianxing He1,2

1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; 2Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding to: Jianxing He, MD, PhD, FACS. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. No. 151, Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, PR China. Email: drjianxing.he@gmail.com.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence of peri-operative complications in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with co-existent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who undergo lung resection via traditional and minimally invasive techniques.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 152 NSCLC patients with COPD who underwent thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery. Particular attention is given to the relationship between disease severity or surgical approach and the incidence of complications.

Results: The prevalence of respiratory and cardiac complications was significantly higher in patients with severe/extremely severe COPD than those with mild to moderate COPD (respiratory compications: 37.3% vs. 20.4%, P=0.022; cardiac complications: 16.9% vs. 6.5%, P=0.040). Patients who underwent complete-video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (c-VATS) had a significantly lower overall morbidity of adverse reactions than those who had undergone VATS major resection (26.3% vs. 42.1%, P=0.044). Among patients with severe/extremely severe COPD, there was no significant difference in the incidence of any complication between the lobectomy group and wedge resection group (38.8% vs. 70.0%, P=0.072). Overall, the occurrence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in patients who underwent c-VATS than in those who had undergone VATS major resection surgery (34.2% vs. 61.9%, P=0.038).

Conclusions: VATS techniques are suitable for COPD patients and are demonstrated here to lower the incidence of post-operative complications when compared with more invasive approaches.

Keywords: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); thoracic surgery


Submitted Jul 07, 2013. Accepted for publication Jul 27, 2013.

doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.25


Introduction

Lung cancer has been one of the leading causes of death in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In the United States, the incidence of lung cancer in patients with COPD (16.7/1,000 person-years) is much higher than reported in the general population (76.4/1,000,000 in men and 52.7/1,000,000 in women) (1). Whilst surgical resection remains the treatment of choice for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and co-existing COPD, reduced lung function and poor respiratory reserve make these patients higher risk for surgery. Traditionally, this has resulted in thoracic surgeons adopting a more conservative approach in this patient group, a consequence of which is relatively strict selection criteria for surgical intervention (2). However, recent advances in the field of thoracic surgery, in particular video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), have led to a recent decline in the morbidity and mortality associated with surgery in NSCLC patients in comparison to ten years ago (3,4). There is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that surgery can be performed safely in individuals with both COPD and NSCLC, with emphasis on the need to revise the current selection criteria for these patients (5-7). The aim of this study was to determine whether minimally invasive techniques are beneficial for patients with NSCLC and co-existing COPD.


Patients and methods

Patients

Between March 2000 and September 2010, 152 NSCLC patients with a diagnosis of COPD, in accordance with the Global Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD (8), were enrolled in the study. Those enrolled included 55 cases of mild COPD [forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ≤70%, FEV1 ≥80% predicted), 38 cases of moderate COPD (FEV1/FVC ≤70%, 50%≤ FEV1 <80% predicted), 46 cases of severe COPD (FEV1/FVC ≤70%, 30%≤ FEV1 <50% predicted) and 13 cases of extremely severe COPD (FEV1/FVC ≤70%, FEV1 <30% predicted). All tumors were deemed operable based on anatomical location and staging as defined by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) guidelines 2007 [1]. Of the 152 patients with NSCLC Sixty-two cases were stage I, fifty-nine were stage II with the remaining thirty-one stage IIIA. There were no patients with significant contraindications of cardiovascular, digestive, urinary, endocrine or other systemic disease. The same surgical team performed the operations, and all cases were divided in two groups with randomly: 57 patients underwent VATS major resection (VATS major resection, approach that used both direct vision and television monitor visualization) whilst the remaining 95 underwent c-VATS (complete VATS) (Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1. General data of the enrolled patients.
Full Table

All patients recieved standardized COPD treatment for a minimum of one week, which included pharmaceutical therapy and chest physiotherapy to improve lung function. Intubation via a double-lumen endotracheal tube was used for all patients. Wedge resection was performed in 10 patients with severe/extremely severe COPD whilst the remaining 142 patients underwent standard lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. Patients were postoperatively managed with antibiotics, bronchial relaxation, spasmolytics, phlegm reduction techniques, oxygen therapy and physical expectoration. Patients with poor expectoration were managed with bronchoscopic suctioning, and those who experienced respiratory failure were treated with mechanical ventilation.

Data collection

Preoperative pulmonary function testing, 6-minute walk tests, operation duration and postoperative respiratory complications (lung infections, air leakage, bronchospasm, respiratory function failure, mechanical ventilation and atelectasis) were recorded. Data was also collected regarding cardiac complications (myocardial infarction and arrhythmia), number of deaths, indwelling chest tube duration and length of hospital stay. A repeat 6-minute walk test was conducted four weeks following surgery.

Statistical analysis

Postoperative complications were compared using paired t-test, and count data were compared using the chi-square test and Fisher exact test in the SPSS13.0. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.


Results

Postoperative pulmonary air leak was reported in twenty patients and managed with a prolonged (>14 days) indwelling chest tube, suction (where appropriate) and supportive treatment. Twenty-one patients experienced bronchospasm, which was treated with spasmolytic agents. Six patients were documented as having respiratory failure, hypoxia and carbon dioxide retention. Four of the six still required mechanical ventilation after symptomatic treatment. Two of these patients were discharged after removal of ventilation (three and six days). The other two patients unfortunately passed away (Table 2).

Table 2
Table 2. Postoperative complications in the subjects.
Full Table

Stratified analysis revealed significantly higher complication rates (Table 3) in severe/extremely severe COPD patients when compared to the mild to moderate COPD patients (P=0.040). The incidence of any complication was significantly lower in the c-VATS groups than the VATS major resection group (P=0.044). Additionally, there was a significantly higher incidence of any complication in the lobectomy group than in patients undergoing wedge resection (P=0.032).

Table 3
Table 3. Stratified analysis of complications.
Full Table

Patients with mild to moderate COPD had significantly shorter hospital stays than severe/extremely severe COPD patients (P=0.005) (Table 4). There was no significant difference in performance pre and post-operatively in the 6 minutes walk tests in the c-VATS group (P>0.05). A significantly reduced distance was observed in the VATS major resection group however (P<0.05) (Table 5).

Table 4
Table 4. Influence of the severity of COPD on the surgery.
Full Table
Table 5
Table 5. Influence of surgical approach on the results of 6-minute walk tests.
Full Table

The impact of surgical approach and resection extent on postoperative complications for the 59 severe/extremely severe COPD patients is reported in Table 6. Because of the poor lung function, 10 patients underwent a wedge resection considering that they cannot tolerate a lobectomy. A lower incidence of both respiratory and cardiac complications was shown in the c-VATS group compared with the VATS major resection group (P<0.05). No difference was found between the lobectomy group and the wedge resection group (P>0.05).

Table 6
Table 6. Impact of surgical factors on postoperative complications in patients with severe/extremely severe COPD.
Full Table

Discussion

The reported benefits of c-VATS over traditional muscle splitting thoracotomy are many and include a reduction in post-operative pain and complications (9). The minimally invasive nature of the surgery reduces the adverse impact on pulmonary function; a result of limited damage to the chest wall and minimal trauma to the respiratory muscles. Therefore, for lung cancer patients with COPD in whom the risks of surgery are high, thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery provides a safe alternative to conventional techniques. Even in individuals who can not tolerate radical lobectomy, partial resection via VATS may still be of therapeutic benefit.

In COPD patients who undergo surgery for NSCLC, the most common postoperative complication is parenchymal air leak (10). In the presented study, there was a difference in the morbidity mild to moderate COPD patients and those with severe/extremely severe COPD after surgery (20.4% vs. 37.3%, P=0.022), which was mainly attributed to parenchymal air leak (8.6% vs. 20.3%). This is likely attributed to the poor quality of the lung parenchyma and the diminished elastic recoil in emphysema, which, in turn, delays healing of the lung tissue. Other complications between the mild to moderate and severe/extremely severe patients included bronchospasm (8.6% vs. 23.7% respectively), and respiratory dysfunction (2.2% vs. 10.2% respectively). In addition, the rates of cardiac complications differed between the two groups (6.5% vs. 16.9%, P=0.040). This could be explained by chronic hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension and associated atrial volume-pressure function disorders in severe COPD patients. These disorders are known to precipitate arrhythmias and other cardiac complications in the presence of increased load in the right cardiopulmonary circulation.

Longer lengths of hospital stay were reported in the severe/extremely severe COPD group (16.0±8.8 vs. 9.7±4.1, P=0.005) as a result of an increase in complication rates. To minimize the effects of these complications, patients were encouraged to expectorate, undergo chest physiotherapy, and therapeutic agents which promote bronchial relaxation were administered during the post-operative period. Fiber-optic bronchoscopy and wound analgesia were also utilised to manage those having difficulty with expectoration. These active interventions are thought to be beneficial in the prevention of post-operative complications.

VATS major resection group and the c-VATS group, and revealed a significant difference (42.1% vs. 26.3%, P=0.044). This was particularly evident in patients with severe/extremely severe COPD. In this subpopulation, the frequency of pulmonary and cardiac complications was significantly lower in patients who underwent resection via c-VATS than in the VATS major resection group. These findings reflect the advantages of c-VATS attributed to its minimally invasive nature and are particularly relevant to patients with poor respiratory function as a consequence of severe/extremely severe COPD. It has also been proved that minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery is reported to have less of an adverse effect to the residual lung function, whilst conventional thoracotomy is associated with a 30-50% decrease in pulmonary function (11-13).

The incidence of air leak in patients undergoing conventional thoracotomy for NSCLC has previously been reported at 52% among 21 severe/extremely severe COPD (10). In the current study, only 13.2% of patients in the c-VATS were reported to have a post-operative air leak. This was potentially related to optimization of our surgical technique where division and suture of pulmonary fissures was completed following the natural anatomical plane. Additionally, margins were trimmed in an inverted U-shape when dissecting the upper lung field. Vacuum suction and intensive bronchial relaxation were administered when appropriate, to improve postoperative lung compliance, reduced airway resistance and promote lung expansion. Optimization of post-operative nutrition was also employed to facilitate wound healing and prevent the occurence of air leakage.

The c-VATS approach was also more efficacious in reducing selective cardiac complications. In the presented study, only 5.3% of the patients with severe/extremely severe COPD in the c-VATS group suffered a cardiac arrhythmia. We have hypothesized that this was related to reduced postoperative pain and improved oxygenation in this subpopulation.

To assess postoperative recovery, quality of life and cardiopulmonary function in our cohort, we performed 6-minute walk tests before and one month after surgery. We found a remarkable decline in performance in the VATS major resection group regardless of COPD severity. On the contrary, no difference was observed in the c-VATS group before and after surgery. We believe that lung volume reduction contributed to this finding. In patients with severe COPD lung volume reduction can improve elastic recoil, reduce resistance to blood flow and blood perfusion is appropriately redistributed with an associated improvement in the ventilation/perfusion ratio. This has the combined effect of raising the oxygenation capacity. This benefit is demonstrated to be particularly evident when the tumor is located in an area severely compromised by COPD (10,14).

Standard radical surgery for NSCLC includes anatomical lobectomy plus lymph node dissection. It remains controversial however, as to whether patients with severe/extremely severe COPD can tolerate lobectomy. Sufficient residual lung function is a prerequisite for lung surgery, and good postoperative lung function can reduce both the risk of surgery and postoperative complications (15). Previous studies have suggested that eligibility for surgery in this population relies on a predicted FEV1 of not less than 0.8 L after surgery (16). In the general population a preoperative FEV1 ≥50% or predicted postoperative FEV1 of greater than 40% is generally considered acceptable (17,18). With improved surgical, anesthetic and perioperative care techniques however; the potential for curative surgery in patients with severe pulmonary insufficiency has become a reality. One study of 13 COPD patients undergoing lobectomy with a mean preoperative FEV1 of 49% reported a decline in lung function that was less than expected (19). In another study where radical resection of lung cancer for 29 severe COPD patients was performed, the authors concluded that patients with a predicted postoperative FEV1 of less than 40% could tolerate lobectomy if the tumor was located on the opposite side of emphysema with a perfusion of less than 10% (20). Taking advantage of the protective effects of thoracoscopic minimally invasive techniques, we can further expand the potential for curative surgery in patients with poor lung function. Following consideration of ventilation perfusion imaging, tumor location and size, and tracheal and vascular invasion, patients with preoperative FEV1 of less than 50% can be considered for surgery (Figure 1). These patients can be divided into two categories. The first group includes those who have lost the pulmonary function of the lobe where the tumor is located. This is typically seen in larger lesions that occlude the corresponding bronchi and compress the vessels, resulting in reduced perfusion. These patients may tolerate thoracoscopic resection with a FEV1 of <50% or even <30%, as long as there are no signs of respiratory failure. The second group includes patients who have satisfactory pulmonary function in the lobe, which corresponds to the tumor. In these patients, the postoperative lung function is predicted by formal assessment of lung function (pre-operative FEV1), heart function, pulmonary ventilation perfusion, chest CT examination, blood gas analysis, and calculation of the estimated postoperative FEV1 (epo FEV1) based on the BTS guidelines (21). With an estimated postoperative FEV1 of ≥35%, normal Ejection Fraction (EF) and PaCO2 of <50 mmHg, the patients can generally tolerate c-VATS lobectomy. In the case of an estimated postoperative FEV1 <35%, normal EF and PaCO2 of <50 mmHg, c-VATS partial resection is recommended to preserve postoperative pulmonary function. Surgery is contraindicated however if PaCO2 is ≥50 mmHg or contraction dysfunction is present at rest without oxygen administration. In this study, 49 patients (83.1%) successfully tolerated radical resection. This was less well tolerated in the patients with sever/extremely severe COPD. There was no significant difference in the incidence of any complication between those two groups (38.8% vs. 70.0%, P=0.072).

Figure 1. Surgical options for patients with severe COPD. A,B. A 56-year-old man with longstanding COPD, FEV1 0.68 L, FEV1 35% of predicted, and a nodule of 1.2 cm × 1.0 cm in the right lower lung. Biopsy confirmed “invasive adenocarcinoma”. Considering the right lower field accounted for almost 20% of the overall ventilation function, the epo FEV1/predicted value =25% Preoperative assessment suggested that the patient could not tolerate lobectomy due to the significant impact on his pulmonary function. Therefore, wedge resection of the right lower lung was performed. The patient was safe and stable throughout the perioperative period. C,D. A 58-year-old man with longstanding COPD, FEV1 0.72 L, FEV1 38% of predicted, and an occupying lesion measuring 5 cm × 4.5 cm in the left lower lobe. Bronchoscopy confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. Radical resection of the lower left lung was conducted. The patient was safe and stable throughout the perioperative period.

In conclusion, despite high incidence rates of postoperative complications in patients with NSCLC and COPD, VATS-guided approaches are suitable for the majority of patients and can significantly reduce post-operative morbidity. Controversy remains in regard to the selection criteria of patients with COPD for thoracoscopic lobectomy. In this population, radical or partial resection based on comprehensive evaluation can benefit patients with severe/extremely severe COPD and provide therapeutic opportunity for a wider subgroup of lung cancer patients with COPD.


Acknowledgements

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.


References

  1. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:706-14. [PubMed]
  2. de Torres JP, Marín JM, Casanova C, et al. Lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-- incidence and predicting factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:913-9. [PubMed]
  3. Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012;1:3-10. [PubMed]
  4. Rashid OM, Takabe K. Are video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery (RVATS) for pulmonary resection ready for prime time? J Thorac Dis 2012;4:341-2. [PubMed]
  5. Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, et al. A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012;1:16-23. [PubMed]
  6. Dong Q, Liang L, Li Y, et al. Anesthesia with nontracheal intubation in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2012;4:126-30. [PubMed]
  7. Kim JK, Jang SH, Lee JW, et al. Clinical parameters affecting prediction accuracy of postoperative lung function in non-small cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:1019-23. [PubMed]
  8. Gruffydd-Jones K, Loveridge C. The 2010 NICE COPD Guidelines: how do they compare with the GOLD guidelines? Prim Care Respir J 2011;20:199-204. [PubMed]
  9. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Ma P, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and World Health Organization Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD): executive summary. Respir Care 2001;46:798-825. [PubMed]
  10. Yim AP. VATS major pulmonary resection revisited--controversies, techniques, and results. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:615-23. [PubMed]
  11. Choong CK, Meyers BF, Battafarano RJ, et al. Lung cancer resection combined with lung volume reduction in patients with severe emphysema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1323-31. [PubMed]
  12. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, et al. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1644-6. [PubMed]
  13. Freeman RK, Wozniak TC, Fitzgerald EB. Functional and physiologic results of video-assisted thoracoscopic diaphragm plication in adult patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1853-7; discussion 1857.
  14. Sekine Y, Kesler KA, Behnia M, et al. COPD may increase the incidence of refractory supraventricular arrhythmias following pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2001;120:1783-90. [PubMed]
  15. Schattenberg T, Muley T, Dienemann H, et al. Impact on pulmonary function after lobectomy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;55:500-4. [PubMed]
  16. Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, et al. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007;132:161S-77S.
  17. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, et al. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest 1994;105:753-9. [PubMed]
  18. British Thoracic Society, Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Working Party. BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax 2001;56:89-108. [PubMed]
  19. Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:902-10. [PubMed]
  20. Korst RJ, Ginsberg RJ, Ailawadi M, et al. Lobectomy improves ventilatory function in selected patients with severe COPD. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:898-902. [PubMed]
  21. Edwards JG, Duthie DJ, Waller DA. Lobar volume reduction surgery: a method of increasing the lung cancer resection rate in patients with emphysema. Thorax 2001;56:791-5. [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Cui F, Liu J, Shao W, He J. Thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Dis 2013;5(S3):S260-S266. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.25