ASCEND-5: too little too late?
Editorial

ASCEND-5: too little too late?

Fengying Wu1, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou2

1Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200433, China; 2Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA

Correspondence to: Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, MD, PhD. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA 92868, USA. Email: ignatius.ou@uci.edu.

Provenance: This is an invited Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Ming-Hui Zhang (Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China).

Comment on: Shaw AT, Kim TM, Crinò L, et al. Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:874-86.


Submitted Aug 13, 2017. Accepted for publication Aug 24, 2017.

doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.147


Since the discovery of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangement in non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) in 2007, there are now four approved ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib) in the US with the most recent one (brigatinib) approved in the US on April 28, 2017 (1). Crizotinib, the first ALK TKI introduced clinically, demonstrated statistically significant improved progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy in two randomized phase 3 trials (PROFILE 1014 and 1029) in advanced treatment-naïve ALK-rearranged NSCLC (2,3). However, resistance will inevitably develop in majority of patients within 12 months from initiation of treatment. Ceritinib is the first next-generation ALK TKI to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on the significant overall response rate and duration of response from the phase 1 ASCEND-1 trial (4,5). Updated clinical efficacy from ASCEND-1 indicated ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients who are refractory to prior ALK TKI achieved a median PFS of 6.9 months when treated with ceritinib (6). Ceritinib is a more potent ALK inhibitor with an inhibitory concentration at 50% (IC50) of 0.2 nM in pure enzymatic inhibitory assay (7) and able to inhibit some of the acquired resistance ALK mutations to crizotinib (8). Thus expectation was high that ceritinib could extend the survival benefit of crizotinib in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients. Pooled analysis of several institutions that participated in the ASCEND-1 indicated sequential use of crizotinib then ceritinib (with or without intervening chemotherapy) could provide median overall survival to 49.4 (9) months higher than a previous retrospective analysis of median OS of 29.6 months with just continuation of crizotinib beyond progression (10). The median PFS of ceritinib in this pooled analysis was 7.8 months. In the follow up phase 2 study on ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients who had disease progression on chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-2), ceritinib achieved a median PFS of 5.7 months (by investigators assessment) or 7.2 months [by blinded independent reviewed committee (BIRC)] (11). ASCEND-5 was designed as one of the two pivotal trials comparing ceritinib to chemotherapy. Specifically ASCEND-5 randomized ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients who had progressed on chemotherapy and crizotinib to ceritinib or single agent chemotherapy, an eligibility criterion very similar to those in ASCEND-2. Ceritinib showed a significant improvement in median PFS of 5.4 months compared to 1.6 months for single chemotherapy as determined by independent review committee [hazard ratio (HR) =0.49; P<0.0001] (12). Ceritinib also achieved an ORR of 45% versus 8% for single agent chemotherapy. Furthermore, adverse events suspected to be treatment-related were reported in 96% (110/115) in the ceritinib group. The most frequently reported any-grade adverse events were diarrhea (63%), nausea (61%), vomiting (48%), increased ALT concentration (42%), increased AST concentration (36%) and decreased appetite (33%). The most frequent grade 3¡ã©4 adverse event in the ceritinib group were increased ALT (21%) concentration, increased γ-GT concentration (21%), and increased AST concentration (14%).

The efficacy of ceritinib observed in this phase 3 study (ASCEND-5) was numerically inferior to that reported in phase 2 (ASCEND-2) data in a similar patient group who had previously received crizotinib and chemotherapy. Despite the similar number of patients treated with ceritinib and a higher proportion of patients with brain metastasis (71% vs. 57%) and heavily pretreated (three or more prior lines of treatment: 56% vs. 11%) in the ASCEND-2 than ASCEND-5, the median PFS of ceritinib dropped from independent review committee determined 7.2 to 5.4 months. Thus while ASCEND-5 was a positive trial, the actual median PFS achieved had progressively shorter from ASCEND-1 to ASCEND-2 to ASCEND-5. All the while, two other next generation ALK TKI have reported phase 2 clinical efficacy data in crizotinib-refractory or crizotinib-intolerant ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients with brigatinib achieving a median PFS of 12.9 months in the ALTA trial at the time of its publication (1). Contemporaneously, ASCEND-4 which compared ceritinib to platinum/pemetrexed doublet chemotherapy in treatment-naïve ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients (13) and ALEX which compared alectinib to crizotinib in treatment-naïve ALK-rearranged NSCLC (14). While both trials are positive in favor of ceritinib and alectinib respectively, ceritinib achieved a median PFS of 16.8 months (13) while alectinib achieved a median PFS of 25.7 months (by independent review committee) (14).

Additionally, progression in the central nervous system (CNS) is common in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patient receiving crizotinib. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse approached 42% at 12 months and ~50% at 18 months based on the results of ALEX in which patients undergo regularly scheduled imaging of the brain regardless of the presence or absence of brain metastasis at the time of enrollment (14). Thus the ability to delay or prevent progression in the CNS will be an important asset of next generation ALK inhibitor. In ASCEND-5, ceritinib was associated with statically significant higher intracranial response than chemotherapy with 35% of patients had an overall intracranial response in the ceritinib versus 5% in the chemotherapy group. The median PFS of patients with brain metastasis at enrollment treated with ceritinib was 4.4 months compared to 1.4 months with chemotherapy (HR =0.5) in ASCEND-5. On the other hand, the median PFS of patients without brain metastasis at enrollment treated with ceritinib 6.9 vs. 2.4 months with chemotherapy (HR =0.45). In comparison to alectinib and brigatinib albeit from single arm phase 2, alectinib and brigatinib seemed to have numerical superior disease control in the CNS when compared to ceritinib (1) although no similarly designed phase 3 randomized trials like ASCEND-5 comparing alectinib or brigatinib to single agent chemotherapy have been conducted. Finally, in the ALEX study, alectinib achieved excellent PFS in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients with or without baseline CNS metastasis (14) while the median PFS achieved by ceritinib in ASCEND-4 in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients with pre-existing brain metastases were much shorter (10.7 months) than ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients without brain metastasis at enrollment (26.3 months) (13).

Poor tolerability of approved dose of ceritinib of 750 mg once daily has always hindered the wide use of ceritinib. The median relative dose intensity of ceritinib was 82% based on a median duration of treatment of approximately 7.1 months in ASCEND-5, while the relative median dose intensity of ceritinib in ASCEND-4 was 78.4% based on a median duration of treatment of 15.5 months (13). In comparison, the mean dose intensity of alectinib was much higher at 95.6% from the ALEX study with a longer median duration of treatment of 17.9 months (14). Recently study from ASCEND-8 indicating the pharmacokinetic (PK) level of ceritinib is similar between 750 mg taken on an empty stomach and 450 mg taken with food with slightly less adverse events (15). However, the efficacy of ceritinib at 450 mg with food cannot be assumed to be equivalent to the efficacy of ceritinib at the approved 750 mg once daily dose (with which ASCEND-2, -4, and -5 were conducted) without any data from randomized trials.

In conclusion while ASCEND-5 established ceritinib as a superior treatment option than single chemotherapy post-crizotinib progression, the rapid development and approval of other next generation ALK inhibitor has diluted the importance of this finding. With the looming approval and wide adaptation of alectinib as first-line treatment of advanced treatment-naïve ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients based on the ALEX trial and supported by the J-ALEX trial (16), the role of ceritinib post-alectinib has never been explored. Lorlatinib, another next generation ALK inhibitor has presented clinical meaningful activity in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patient who had disease progression on 1 prior ALK inhibitor regardless of the specific ALK inhibitor and has received “breakthrough therapy designation” (BTD) from the US FDA (17). Thus in our opinion, the future role of ceritinib in the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC as a second-line therapy post-crizotinib failure is narrow and limited given the many next generation ALK inhibitors available and likely adoption of alectinib as the front-line treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC leaving the role of ceritinib post-alectinib undefined.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Wu has no conflicts of interest to declare. Prof. Ou has served as a compensated advisor to Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, and ARIAD/Takeda.


References

  1. Ou SI. Further Advances in the Management of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:2463-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;371:2167-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Lu S, Mok T, Lu Y, et al. Phase 3 study of first-line crizotinib vs pemetrexed−cisplatin/carboplatin (PCC) in East Asian patients (pts) with ALK+ advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 2016;34:abstr 9058.
  4. Khozin S, Blumenthal GM, Zhang L, et al. FDA approval: ceritinib for the treatment of metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:2436-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Mehra R, et al. Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1189-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Kim DW, Mehra R, Tan DS, et al. Activity and safety of ceritinib in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-1): updated results from the multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:452-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Marsilje TH, Pei W, Chen B, et al. Synthesis, structure-activity relationships, and in vivo efficacy of the novel potent and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor 5-chloro-N2-(2-isopropoxy-5-methyl-4-(piperidin-4-yl)phenyl)-N4-(2-(isopropylsulfonyl)phenyl)pyrimidine-2,4-diamine (LDK378) currently in phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials. J Med Chem 2013;56:5675-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Friboulet L, Li N, Katayama R, et al. The ALK inhibitor ceritinib overcomes crizotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2014;4:662-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Gainor JF, Tan DS, De Pas T, et al. Progression-Free and Overall Survival in ALK-Positive NSCLC Patients Treated with Sequential Crizotinib and Ceritinib. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:2745-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Ou SH, Jänne PA, Bartlett CH, et al. Clinical benefit of continuing ALK inhibition with crizotinib beyond initial disease progression in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2014;25:415-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Crinò L, Ahn MJ, De Marinis F, Groen HJ, et al. Multicenter Phase II Study of Whole-Body and Intracranial Activity With Ceritinib in Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy and Crizotinib: Results From ASCEND-2. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2866-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Shaw AT, Kim TM, Crinò L, et al. Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:874-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, et al. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2017;389:917-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017. [Epub ahead of print]. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Cho BC, Kim DW, Bearz A, et al. ASCEND-8: A Randomized Phase 1 Study of Ceritinib, 450 mg or 600 mg, Taken with a Low-Fat Meal versus 750 mg in Fasted State in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Rearranged Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). J Thorac Oncol 2017;12:1357-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Hida T, Nokihara H, Kondo M, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;390:29-39. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Shaw AT, Ou SH, Felip E, et al. Efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) with >1 prior ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI): A phase 1/2 study. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:abstr 9006.
Cite this article as: Wu F, Ou SH. ASCEND-5: too little too late? J Thorac Dis 2017;9(10):3477-3479. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.147