Use of plasma neutrophil gelatinas associated lipocalin level to identify critical patients with acute kidney injury that require renal replacement therapy: is it a reliable biomarker?
Editorial

Use of plasma neutrophil gelatinas associated lipocalin level to identify critical patients with acute kidney injury that require renal replacement therapy: is it a reliable biomarker?

Jahan Porhomayon1, Rukma Parthvi2

1Department of Anesthesiology, 2Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

Correspondence to: Jahan Porhomayon, MD, FCCP, FCCM. Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Email: jahanpor@buffalo.edu.

Provenance: This is a Guest Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Xuezhong Xing, MD [National Cancer Center (NCC)/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Beijing, China].

Comment on: Srisawat N, Laoveeravat P, Limphunudom P, et al. The effect of early renal replacement therapy guided by plasma neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin on outcome of acute kidney injury: a feasibility study. J Crit Care 2018;43:36-41.


Submitted Jan 15, 2019. Accepted for publication Feb 14, 2019.

doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.51


High levels of plasma neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (pNGAL) have been reported to show strong correlation with renal replacement therapy (RRT) for patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Current literature outlines several benefits and associated risks of RRT in intensive care unit (ICU) (1). However the proposed parameters for starting RRT are inconsistent such as the use of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine. Also the duration of RRT in AKI for ICU patients is not clearly defined (2). pNGAL has been reported as a reliable novel AKI biomarker (3). This study aims to find the use of pNGAL level to identify high-risk AKI patients before starting RRT and also using the level of pNGAL as a monitoring tool for renal recovery in critical care settings.

The authors have studied 60 patients with AKI who were not previously on dialysis and had a serum creatinine level of more than 2 mg/dL in males while more than 1.5 mg/dL in females. Based on the pNGAL levels, patients were classified in two main groups: high pNGAL group with pNGAL more than 400 ng/mL and low pNGAL group with below 400 ng/mL. About 40 patients had a high pNGAL value. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group had early initiation of RRT (within 12 hours). The other group had RRT initiated based on refractory acidosis, hyperkalemia with ECG abnormalities, fluid overload, reduced urine output and elevated blood urea nitrogen above 60 mg/dL. For both the groups pNGAL levels were assessed daily for one week then weekly for 28 days along with basic metabolic panel, urine output and timing of continuous RRT. The primary outcome was mortality that was 15% compared to 45% in the standard. Similarly, other outcomes including ICU free days were not statistically different. However significant decrease in ventilation days was observed in early arm.

Hence pNGAL may be a reliable biomarker of positive fluid balance and renal injury. It may be included in a set of prerequisites for deciding upon RRT initiation in the ICU. Other studies have also looked at variables to find a defining criterion for RRT like using blood urea nitrogen level which currently is not an indicator. But most of these studies have smaller sample size. Small sample size is a weakness which limits the power to discriminate significant mortality. About 1,500 patients for each group are required for valid results (1). Another weakness is a very high cut off point of pNGAL in this study which can cause delay in enrollment time. This is because the patients with pNGAL below 400 ng/mL may also need RRT. Despite limitations, this study clearly reveals that it may be possible to use pNGAL levels as a biomarker in deciding when to initiate RRT in patients with severe AKI. Additionally, these levels can help in identifying the patients who will get the most benefits from early RRT initiation. Larger randomized controlled studies are needed to further validate the use. We look forward to the trials looking at a list of variables along with pNGAL that can be used as a scoring tool to initiate RRT in critically ill patients (4,5).


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Srisawat N, Laoveeravat P, Limphunudom P, et al. The effect of early renal replacement therapy guided by plasma neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin on outcome of acute kidney injury: a feasibility study. J Crit Care 2018;43:36-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Wu VC, Ko WJ, Chang HW, et al. Early renal replacement therapy in patients with postoperative acute liver failure associated with acute renal failure: effect on postoperative outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:266-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Srisawat N, Murugan R, Lee M, et al. Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin predicts recovery from acute kidney injury following community-acquired pneumonia. Kidney Int. 2011;80:545-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Smith OM, Wald R, Adhikari NK, et al. Standard versus accelerated initiation of renal 4. replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (STARRT-AKI): study protocol for a randomized 4. controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:320. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al. Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2016;375:122-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Porhomayon J, Parthvi R. Use of plasma neutrophil gelatinas associated lipocalin level to identify critical patients with acute kidney injury that require renal replacement therapy: is it a reliable biomarker? J Thorac Dis 2019;11(Suppl 9):S1261-S1262. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.51

Download Citation