Efficacy of crizotinib in ALK fusion variants
Commentary

Efficacy of crizotinib in ALK fusion variants

Tetsu Kobayashi1, Hajime Fujimoto1, Esteban C. Gabazza2

1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, 2Department of Immunology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan

Correspondence to: Esteban C. Gabazza, MD, PhD. Department of Immunology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Edobashi 2-174, Tsu-City, Mie 514-8507, Japan. Email: gabazza@doc.medic.mie-u.ac.jp.

Submitted Sep 08, 2016. Accepted for publication Sep 12, 2016.

doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.62


In 1995, rearrangement of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene was first reported as a fusion gene in anaplastic large cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and in 2005 it was again on focus when Soda et al. reported that echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like4 (EML4)-ALK fusion gene is a powerful oncogene in lung cancer (1,2). EML4-ALK is a fusion of the intracellular scaffold protein EML4 and the kinase protein ALK. The EML4-ALK fusion protein constitutively activates ALK kinase by forming a coiled-coil domain in the EML4 region (2). About 3–5% of non-small cell lung cancer is positive for EML4-ALK (2). Transgenic mice expressing EML4-ALK develop non-small cell lung cancer (3). Several drugs that inhibit the activity of this fusion gene have been recently developed. Crizotinib that was initially developed as a mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor can also inhibit multiple kinases including ALK. In 2008, crizotinib was used as an ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in a phase I clinical trial in ALK-positive lung cancer patients (4). The study showed a good overall response rate (ORR; 60.8%) and progression-free survival (PFS; 9.7 months) (4). Thereafter, similar ORR and PFS results were reported in a phase II clinical trial, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it in 2011 (5). Crizotinib became available for clinical use in a very short time (4 years) since its initial report, and is currently the first line therapy for ALK-positive lung cancer. However, subsequent studies have shown frequent recurrence and brain metastasis of ALK-positive lung tumors that are resistant to crizotinib therapy (6-8).

There are at least 10 different variants of EML4-ALK (9). All variants have the essential coiled-coil domain in the EML4 N-terminal portion and in the kinase domain of ALK exon 20 that are necessary for transforming activity. Fusion of exon 13 of EML4 with exon 20 of ALK (variant 1: v1), exon 20 of EML4 with exon 20 of ALK (v2), and exon 6 of EML4 with exon 20 of ALK (v3a/b) are some of the common variants (9). An in vitro study has reported that v1, v2, v3a and v3b variants have different sensitivity to crizotinib (10).

Yoshida et al. reported very interesting results regarding the effect of crizotinib in ALK fusion variants (11). The authors retrospectively investigated the effect of crizotinib on ORR and PFS in 35 patients with different ALK variants among a total of 55 patients treated with crizotinib between January 2007 and December 2014 (11). The most common ALK variant was v1 (19/35; 54%) followed by v2 (5/35; 14%), v3a/b (4/35; 12%), and other variants (7/35; 20%). The ORR was 69% in all patients, 74% in v1 and 63% in other variants. The median PFS was significantly longer in v1 than in other variants (11.0 vs. 4.2 months; P<0.05). A multivariate analysis identified two independent factors in association with PFS prolongation: ALK v1 (hazard ratio: 0.350; P<0.05) and advanced stage (hazard ratio: 4.646; P<0.05) (11). These observations suggest that crizotinib is more effective in tumors with ALK v1 than in other variants.

Based on the study of Yoshida et al. it appears that the type of ALK variant may influence the efficacy of ALK-TKI. However, this study has some limitations (11). One limitation is the small population and the second limitation is the retrospective nature of the study that includes patients in various stages of treatment before or after crizotinib. In addition, this study failed to provide data to explain the mechanism behind the effect of v1. An in vitro study has shown that the v2 variant has a higher sensitivity to crizotinib than v1 or v3 (10). Further, a previous phase I clinical trial found no difference in response rate between variants (12). Racial differences may also exist but evidence is lacking. Li et al. evaluated the frequency of ALK variants in 7,244 non-small cell lung cancer samples from a North American cohort study and found 200 samples (2.7%) positive for EML4-ALK, and among these 109 (54.5%) were v1, 20 (10%) v2, and 68 (34%) v3 (13).

In addition to crizotinib various ALK-TKIs are currently available. Ceritinib, which is indicated in ALK-positive tumors resistant or refractory to crizotinib, was approved by FDA in 2014, and alectinib, developed in Japan, was approved by FDA in 2016 (14). Other TKIs including brigatinib and lorlatinib are currently awaiting approval for clinical use. The sequential order in which these drugs are used is a controversial issue. Based on a retrospective study Ito et al. reported that alectinib is more effective when it is used after crizotinib (15).

Different therapeutic response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKIs depending on the site of EGFR mutation has been previously reported (16,17). Therefore, the effect of ALK-TKIs may similarly differ according to the EML4-ALK variant, and in this connection, the work reported by Yoshida et al. is important because it draws attention to this possibility (11). However, a further prospective study in a larger population that includes subjects with different ethnic background would be necessary to confirm these observations.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Provenance: This is an invited Commentary commissioned by the Section Editor Long Jiang (Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China).

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Comment on: Yoshida T, Oya Y, Tanaka K, et al. Differential Crizotinib Response Duration Among ALK Fusion Variants in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:3383-9.


References

  1. Morris SW, Kirstein MN, Valentine MB, et al. Fusion of a kinase gene, ALK, to a nucleolar protein gene, NPM, in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Science 1995;267:316-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature 2007;448:561-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Soda M, Takada S, Takeuchi K, et al. A mouse model for EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:19893-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Camidge DR, Bang YJ, Kwak EL, et al. Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:1011-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Kazandjian D, Blumenthal GM, Chen HY, et al. FDA approval summary: crizotinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements. Oncologist 2014;19:e5-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Choi YL, Soda M, Yamashita Y, et al. EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1734-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Katayama R, Shaw AT, Khan TM, et al. Mechanisms of acquired crizotinib resistance in ALK-rearranged lung Cancers. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:120ra17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Sasaki T, Koivunen J, Ogino A, et al. A novel ALK secondary mutation and EGFR signaling cause resistance to ALK kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res 2011;71:6051-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Sasaki T, Rodig SJ, Chirieac LR, et al. The biology and treatment of EML4-ALK non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:1773-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Heuckmann JM, Balke-Want H, Malchers F, et al. Differential protein stability and ALK inhibitor sensitivity of EML4-ALK fusion variants. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:4682-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Yoshida T, Oya Y, Tanaka K, et al. Differential Crizotinib Response Duration Among ALK Fusion Variants in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:3383-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Antoniu SA. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363(18):1693-703. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2011;15:351-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Li T, Maus MK, Desai SJ, et al. Large-scale screening and molecular characterization of EML4-ALK fusion variants in archival non-small-cell lung cancer tumor specimens using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:18-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Larkins E, Blumenthal GM, Chen H, et al. FDA Approval: Alectinib for the Treatment of Metastatic, ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Crizotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Ito K, Hataji O, Kobayashi H, et al. Sequential Therapy with Crizotinib and Alectinib in ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Multicenter Retrospective Study. J Thorac Oncol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Riely GJ, Pao W, Pham D, et al. Clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:839-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:141-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Kobayashi T, Fujimoto H, Gabazza EC. Efficacy of crizotinib in ALK fusion variants. J Thorac Dis 2016;8(10):E1381-E1383. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.62