TY - JOUR AU - Joo, Hyun-Chel AU - Youn, Young-Nam AU - Ko, Young-Guk AU - Choi, Donghoon AU - Won, Jong Yun AU - Lee, Do Yun AU - Yoo, Kyung-Jong PY - 2018 TI - Comparison of open surgical versus hybrid endovascular repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms with distal arch involvement JF - Journal of Thoracic Disease; Vol 10, No 6 (June 30, 2018): Journal of Thoracic Disease Y2 - 2018 KW - N2 - Background: Our aim was to compare the efficacies of conventional open thoracotomy and hybrid endovascular technique in patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms involving the distal arch. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 125 consecutive patients with descending aneurysms involving distal arch underwent open repair via thoracotomy (n=79) or zone 1/2 hybrid endovascular repair (n=46). Surgeries entailing total arch replacement by elephant trunk technique (with sternotomy) and Zone 0 hybrid arch repairs were excluded. Early and late outcomes were compared using propensity scores and inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: In-hospital mortality rates for open repair (10.1%) and hybrid repair (6.5%) did not differ significantly (P=0.49). Major adverse outcomes included stroke (11.4% vs . 8.7%), paraplegia (2.5% vs . 0.0%) and lung complications (19.0% vs . 6.5%). Once adjusted by IPTW, hospital mortality risk for conventional open repair (OR =4.396; P=0.086) tended to be higher, and there was significant risk of lung complications (OR =4.372; P=0.025). However, both techniques were similar in terms of 30-day mortality (OR =2.745; P=0.257), stroke (OR =2.134; P=0.217), paraplegia (OR =3.639; P=0.407), and midterm survival (OR =1.05; P=0.90). Freedom from reintervention at 10 years was significantly better for open repair (85.2%±7.1%) compared with the hybrid approach (46.3%±11.0%; OR =0.13; P Conclusions: Hybrid arch repair conferred a significantly lower incidence of pulmonary complications, without benefitting perioperative mortality and stroke. However, open repair proved more reliable, showing greater durability. Long-term investigations are needed to confirm the viability and safety of hybrid repair as an alternative treatment in this setting. UR - https://jtd.amegroups.org/article/view/21829