Chinese herbal injections plus Western Medicine on inflammatory factors for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Original Article

Chinese herbal injections plus Western Medicine on inflammatory factors for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Xiuying Zhu#, Xiangbo Meng#, Na Lei, Zhengnan Shen, Xia Li, Hongfei Song, Quansheng Feng, Yinling Guo

School of Basic Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: X Zhu, X Meng; (II) Administrative support: Y Guo; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Z Shen, N Lei, X Li, H Song; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: X Zhu, X Meng; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: X Zhu, X Meng; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence to: Yinling Guo, Doctor of Medicine. School of Basic Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu 611137, China. Email: guoyinling@cdutcm.edu.cn.

Background: Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are commonly prescribed in China as adjuvant therapy for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, evidence supporting the effect of CHIs on inflammatory factors for patients with AECOPD is insufficient, posing a challenge for clinicians to choose the optimal CHIs for AECOPD. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the effectiveness of several CHIs combined with Western Medicine (WM) and WM alone on the inflammatory factors in AECOPD.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on different CHIs for treating AECOPD were thoroughly searched from several electronic databases up to August 2022. The quality assessment of the included RCTs was conducted according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses were designed to assess the effectiveness of different CHIs. Systematic Review Registration CRD42022323996.

Results: A total of 94 eligible RCTs involving 7,948 patients were enrolled in this study. The NMA results showed that using Xuebijing (XBJ), Reduning (RDN), Tanreqing (TRQ), and Xiyanping (XYP) injections combined with WM significantly improved treatment effects compared to using WM alone. XBJ + WM and TRQ + WM significantly changed the level of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells, percentage of neutrophils, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). TRQ + WM showed the most significant effect in reducing the level of procalcitonin. XYP + WM and RDN + WM could reduce the level of white blood cells and the percentage of neutrophils. A total of 12 studies reported adverse reactions in detail, and 19 studies demonstrated no significant adverse reactions.

Conclusions: This NMA showed that using CHIs combined with WM could significantly reduce the level of inflammatory factors in AECOPD. A combination of TRQ and WM may be a relatively prior adjuvant therapy option for AECOPD treatment considering its effects in reducing the levels of the anti-inflammatory mediators.

Keywords: Chinese herbal injections (CHIs); inflammatory factors; acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD); systematic review; network meta-analysis (NMA)


Submitted Feb 08, 2023. Accepted for publication Apr 17, 2023. Published online Apr 23, 2023.

doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-402


Highlight box

Key findings

• CHIs combined with WM could improve treatment performance for patients with AECOPD, and TRQ + WM may be the best choice in AECOPD treatment.

What is known and what is new?

• CHIs combined with WM mainly improve the efficacy of AECOPD treatment by reducing the level of inflammatory factors in serum. Although many previously published double-arm meta-analyses had evaluated the effectiveness of CHIs on serum inflammatory factors in AECOPD, the curative effects of various CHIs were not horizontally compared and ranked.

• This study ranked the efficacy of CHIs treatment through NMA, and TRQ + WM showed a preferable improvement in all the outcomes of AECOPD.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• In the treatment of AECOPD patients, clinicians can consider using TRQ + WM injections to reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in AECOPD patients, and then improving clinical efficacy.


Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, preventable, and treatable disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow restriction. The disease is caused by abnormal airways and/or alveoli due to long-term exposure to harmful particles or gases (1). The global prevalence of COPD is about 11.7%, and the annual mortality rate is about 3.5 million. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that by 2030, more than 4.5 million people will die of COPD and related diseases worldwide every year (2). In China, the COPD prevalence in the population over 40 years old in China is 13.7%, and there are nearly 100 million COPD patients (3,4), ranking third among all the disease-related causes of death (5). The acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) follows the natural course of COPD, which is manifested by the aggravation of clinical symptoms, the decline of pulmonary function, and the reduction of quality of life. Most patients experience other diseases concurrently, resulting in an increase in mortality and economic burden (6). About 22–40% of patients with COPD experience at least 1 bout of moderate or severe exacerbation every year (7).

The Western Medicine (WM) of AECOPD, such as long-term use of bronchodilators and inhalation of corticosteroids, which can increase the incidence of adverse events (8,9). Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are a new type of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) preparation, which are made by extracting and purifying the effective and active compounds from herbs (or other decoctions) via modern scientific techniques and methods (10,11). During the acute exacerbation of COPD, the activation and accumulation of inflammatory factors in the lungs are internal factors that lead to symptom exacerbation. In recent years, the combination of CHIs and WM could significantly reduce the level of inflammatory factors in AECOPD (12); many previously conducted double-arm meta-analyses have evaluated the effectiveness of CHIs on serum inflammatory factors in AECOPD (13-16). However, the curative effects of various CHIs have not been horizontally compared and ranked. Network meta-analysis (NMA) can synthesize multiple correlation factors, and perform direct or indirect comparisons simultaneously by summarizing different interventions for the same disease. Moreover, NMA can provide evidence for identifying optimal therapies based on the rankings of different outcomes. The NMA method was used in this study to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of 4 CHIs on serum inflammatory factors in AECOPD, the 4 CHIs included Reduning injection (RDN), Tanreqing injection (TRQ), Xuebijing injection (XBJ), and Xiyanping injection (XYP), and to explore the optimal CHI for reducing inflammatory factor levels in AECOPD. We present the following article in accordance with the PRISMA reporting checklist (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-402/rc).


Methods

NMA analysis was performed based on the following procedures: literature search, inclusion criteria data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analysis. The protocol of this study was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration code of CRD42022354772.

Inclusion criteria

Types of studies

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating one of the CHIs (RDN, TRQ, XBJ, and XYP) combined with WM in the treatment of AECOPD were eligible.

Types of participants

Patients were diagnosed with AECOPD based on current or previous diagnostic criteria (1,17) with no limitation on gender and nationality.

Types of interventions

Patients in the control group only received WM, such as beta 2-agonists, anticholinergic drugs, theophylline drugs, and inhaled glucocorticoids ect. Patients in the treatment group received CHIs with WM therapy.

Types of outcome measures

The primary outcome measures included C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). The secondary outcome measures included white blood cell (WBC), percentage of neutrophils (NE%), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and adverse reactions.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (I) reviews, duplicate studies, pharmacological experiments, case reports, editorials, and letters; (II) use of TCM treatment methods other than CHIs regimen; (III) for similar articles, only the latest or more comprehensive one was included; (IV) research with incomplete data or obvious errors.

Search strategy

We performed the literature search using four English databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase) and 4 Chinese databases [China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM), and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP)] from the establishment of the databases to August 2022. The search terms included “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease”, “COPD”, “Reduning injection”, “Tanreqing injection”, “Xuebijing injection”, “Xiyanping injection”, “randomized controlled trial”, and “placebo”. The details are presented in Appendix 1.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Data were independently extracted from the eligible RCTs by two researchers (XB Meng and N Lei) based on a custom-made form, and discrepancies were discussed with a third party and resolved by consensus.

The quality assessment was independently performed by two reviewers (XB Meng and N Lei) using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tools (version 5.1.0; http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/). In the case of dissent, resolution was achieved via consensus or a third investigator (XY Zhu).

Statistical analysis

The software R 4.0.3 and Stata 15.1 were employed to analyze data (18). The mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (contain zero, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant), for outcomes were summarized. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) used to determine the probability of a treatment being the most effective (100%: treatment is certain to be the best; 0%: treatment is certain to be the worst) (19,20). The node-splitting method was used to evaluate the local inconsistency of the outcome measures in a closed loop. Furthermore, a comparison funnel plot was used to test the publication bias.


Results

Study selection

A total of 2,595 articles were obtained from 8 databases. After removing duplicates, 1,725 studies were selected. After reviewing the titles and abstracts, the initially selected studies were further screened by the full texts to remove those that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 94 RCTs investigating the combination of CHIs and WM regimen for treating AECOPD were included. Additionally, this NMA included 4 types of CHIs, namely, RDN, TRQ, XBJ, and XYP. All trials were published in Chinese, and the flow diagram is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Flowchart of searching and screening for the studies. AECOPD, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

Study characteristics

A total of 7,948 patients with AECOPD from 94 RCTs were included in this NMA analysis. Among them, 4,031 patients were treated with the combination of CHIs and WM, and 3,917 patients received WM treatment alone. Furthermore, approximately 62% patients were male. The study duration ranged from 3 to 14 days. The basic characteristics of each trial are listed in Table 1. The network graph of the effects of different interventions on the outcome measures is shown in Figure 2.

Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies

Study ID N (E/C) Sex (M/F) Age (years) (E/C) I (E) I (C) Cs (day) Outcome
Zhang et al., 2011 (21) 45/42 67/20 66.2±5.5/65.7±5.6 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 10
Ying, 2011 (22) 32/30 44/18 73.38±7.61/74.21±10.47 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①③④⑧
Wang, 2011 (23) 29/26 29/26 60.25±11.23/58.12±10.58 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①⑥
Wang et al., 2011 (24) 39/39 46/32 62.7±4.8/58.8±6.1 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14
Chen et al., 2011 (25) 30/30 39/21 68±9/71±7 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①⑦
Chen, 2011 (26) 28/32 50/10 72.86±4.40/72.72±4.90 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①③④⑧
Chen et al., 2011 (27) 43/43 54/32 68.3±7.9/65.7±7.3 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 5 ①③④
Hao et al., 2010 (28) 30/30 42/18 66±6/67±5 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 10
Feng, 2010 (29) 54/52 67/39 65.49±9.25/67.13±10.20 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ①③⑥
Yin et al., 2009 (30) 40/40 43/37 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10
Luo et al., 2009 (31) 35/32 53/14 68.2±6.5/67.3±6.7 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14
Du et al., 2009 (32) 50/50 82/18 46-75/48-76 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14
Peng et al., 2008 (33) 32/30 44/18 66.0±1.45/67.1±1.42 XBJ 80 mL + WM WM 4 ①③④
Wang, 2015 (34) 30/30 29/31 69.6/71 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①③④⑧
Wang, 2015 (35) 46/46 53/39 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①③④
Wang et al., 2015 (36) 33/33 40/26 75±12/76±10 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 10 ①②⑥⑦
Luo et al., 2015 (37) 20/20 35/5 76.00±8.62/75.00±9.23 XBJ 200 mL + WM WM 5 ①②③
Li et al., 2015 (38) 50/50 50/50 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 9 ①③④
Zhou, 2014 (39) 30/30 32/28 72.6±5.4/73.1±5.8 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 5-7 ①⑧
Zhang et al., 2014 (40) 46/46 62/30 67.84±7.4/67.64±7.2 XYP 250 mg + WM WM 14
Zhang et al., 2014 (41) 40/40 64/16 62.8±3.5/63.1±3.8 XYP 400 mg + WM WM 10 ①③④⑧
Yue, 2014 (42) 33/32 41/24 73±4.8/70±4.5 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 7-14
Yan, 2014 (43) 55/55 81/29 60.7±8.4/63.4±8.8 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7
Mu, 2014 (44) 36/36 43/29 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①③④
Li et al., 2014 (45) 38/38 42/34 64.3±3.2/66.3±3.8 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①③⑧
Tang, 2013 (46) 30/30 39/21 68±5/63±9 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①⑦
Nie et al., 2013 (47) 50/50 44/56 70.4±11.7/70.2±12.1 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 3 ①②⑦
Ma et al., 2013 (48) 60/60 84/36 61.10±7.21/61.12±12.35 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10
Lu et al., 2013 (49) 30/30 37/23 59.3±8.6/58.4±7.2 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①③④
Li, 2013 (50) 40/40 51/29 70.6±5.95/69.5±5.92 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7
Chen, 2013 (51) 53/53 56/50 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①⑦⑧
Zhang, 2012 (52) 40/40 58/22 69/66 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①⑦
Sun et al., 2012 (53) 52/50 58/44 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 7-10 ①②③⑤⑥⑦⑧
Shi, 2012 (54) 45/41 55/31 69.40±5.70/68.50±7.10 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①⑧
Peng, 2012 (55) 26/26 33/19 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ①⑤⑦
Long, 2012 (56) 64/60 88/36 61.10±7.21/61.12±12.35 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7
Li et al., 2012 (57) 60/60 79/41 41–79/45–76 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 10
Xiu et al., 2019 (58) 15/15 17/13 66.4±2.7/67.1±2.91 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①③④⑧
Fang, 2019 (59) 41/41 50/32 53.86±8.05/54.17±8.27 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①③④
Zhang et al., 2018 (60) 40/40/40 62/58 69.13±5.28/68.93±5.87/
68.36±5.67
XBJ 50 mL + WM WM 10 ①②③⑤⑦
Yang et al., 2018 (61) 30/30 45/15 64.5±11.6/64.2±11.5 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①②③④⑧
Mo et al., 2018 (62) 100/100 TRQ 10 mL + WM WM 10
Li, 2018 (63) 45/45 66/24 61.56±5.24/61.83±5.39 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①②⑧
Li, 2018 (64) 54/54 60/48 68.42±9.17/68.29±9.13 TRQ 30 mL + WM WM 14 ①②
Chen et al., 2018 (65) 28/28 48/8 55.6±15.9/57.3±15.1 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 10 ①⑤⑦
Zhang et al., 2017 (66) 68/68 91/45 68.5±7.2/70.3±6.3 TRQ 20 mL + WM XYP 150 mL + WM 10 ①⑤⑥⑦⑧
Xu, 2017 (67) 53/53 62/44 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①③④
Xi et al., 2017 (68) 39/39 27/51 65.44±1.44/65.48±1.89 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 10 ①②③
Wang et al., 2017 (69) 60/60 104/16 63.2±11.8/64.1±11.2 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①③④
Wang, 2017 (70) 35/35 36/34 69.23±5.29/ 68.94±5.99 XBJ 60 mL + WM WM 7 ①②③⑤⑧
Liang, 2017 (71) 35/35 45/25 62.34±5.52/61.76±5.59 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①⑤⑧
Li, 2017 (72) 55/55 66/44 62.4±9.2/63.8±10.2 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10–14 ①②⑦⑧
Dong, 2017 (73) 32/30 38/24 61.3±6.7/62.6±7.4 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10
Wu et al., 2016 (74) 56/64 80/40 67.5/66.9 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①②③④⑧
Shen et al., 2016 (75) 50/50 78/22 71±10/70±9 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ①②⑤
Ma et al., 2016 (76) 60/60 80/40 64/60 XBJ 50 mL + WM WM 10 ①⑦
Li, 2016 (77) 41/41 43/39 69.3±7.2/70.3±6.8 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 14 ①③④
Hu et al., 2016 (78) 50/50/50 115/35 66.7±4.2/69.3±6.3/68.4±5.8 I1: TRQ 20 mL + WM; I2: XBJ 30 mL + WM WM 7 ①⑤⑥⑦⑧
Hou et al., 2016 (79) 30/30 57.4±8.3/ 58.1±7.9 XYP 250 mg/ + WM WM 10 ①②③④
Liu et al., 2022 (80) 40/40 41/39 54.00±4.68/54.10±3.22 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①②⑥
Fan et al., 2022 (81) 50/50 75/25 63.87±6.03/62.71±5.98 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①②
Tang, 2021 (82) 45/45 48/42 63±6/63±7 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 14 ①②⑤
Huang et al., 2021 (83) 25/25 27/23 64.49±6.29/64.35±6.21 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ①⑤⑦
Yu et al., 2020 (84) 50/50 53/47 49.12±7.67/49.73±7.92 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ①②⑦
Wang et al., 2020 (85) 50/50 61/39 53.49±12.27/3.13±13.85 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ①②⑦
Ren, 2021 (86) 90/90 98/82 58.76±5.29/57.46±4.41 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ②⑤
Qian et al., 2020 (87) 24/24 35/13 62.5±4.0/63.4±5.1 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7
Qiu, 2013 (88) 31/27 36/22 XBJ 200 mL + WM WM 7
Qian et al., 2013 (89) 30/30 32/28 52–65/55–70 XYP 250 mL + WM WM 10 ③④⑧
Bai, 2013 (90) 51/49 71/29 74.8±10.6/72.5±12.2 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7
Xie, 2011 (91) 40/40 58/22 60–85/60–83 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ③④⑧
Ma et al., 2011 (92) 30/30 53/7 79~88/77~87 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 10 ③④⑧
Xu, 2010 (93) 35/25 36/24 67±7.2/65±8.3 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ③④
Zhang et al., 2006 (94) 29/29 38/20 71.48±7.72/69.34±7.83 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 12 ③④
Shi et al., 2022 (95) 44/44 53/35 70.22±5.19/70.13±5.26 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 7 ⑤⑦⑧
Ma, 2022 (96) 35/35 43/27 80.21±3.57/80.16±3.74 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ⑤⑦⑧
Peng et al., 2021 (97) 36/36 39/33 65.83±8.23/63.92±10.32 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 10 ⑤⑥⑦
Chen et al., 2019 (98) 79/79 113/45 67.29±9.48/67.34±10.23 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ⑤⑥⑦⑧
Wang et al., 2009 (99) 43/43 60/26 64.73±5.44/ 65.25±5.34 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 14 ⑤⑥⑦
Li, 2008 (100) 30/30 36/24 73.36/72.39 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ⑤⑦
Xu, 2006 (101) 27/25 33/19 60.0±6.5/59.0±7.8 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 12 ⑤⑥⑦
Feng et al., 2020 (102) 33/33 37/29 53.50±4.30/ 52.89±4.51 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ⑥⑦⑧
Xu et al., 2019 (103) 32/36 44/24 73.60±10.60/75.10±8.30 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ⑥⑦⑧
Pan et al., 2015 (104) 71/71 110/32 65.17±9.24/63.51±11.26 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 15 ⑥⑦⑧
Yang et al., 2014 (105) 60/60 78/42 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 7 ⑥⑦⑧
Xu et al., 2011 (106) 15/15 15/15 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 7 ⑥⑦⑧
Wei et al., 2011 (107) 40/40 44/36 59.26±8.56/58.08±9.28 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ⑥⑦
Li et al., 2011 (108) 28/28 48/8 58.25±8.85/57.42±9.27 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 5 ⑥⑦
Chen et al., 2011 (109) 52/52 66/38 62±8.2/63±9.1 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14 ⑥⑦
Xu, 2010 (110) 15/15 15/15 RDN 20 mL + WM WM 7 ⑥⑦⑧
Yang, 2008 (111) 30/30 53/7 63.2±4.8/ 65.2±8.4 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 10 ⑥⑧
Li et al., 2021 (112) 50/50 51/49 64.84±5.51/65.42±5.23 TRQ 20 mL + WM WM 14
Li et al., 2017 (113) 50/50 47/53 45.2±14.4/45.3±14.2 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 14
Fu et al., 2014 (114) 40/40 41/39 70.2–86.2/69.4–86.3 XBJ 100 mL + WM WM 10

The data in age are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or mean or minimum age to maximum age. ①, C-reactive protein; ②, procalcitonin; ③, white blood cell; ④, percentage of neutrophils; ⑤, interleukin-6; ⑥, interleukin-8; ⑦, tumor necrosis factor-α; ⑧, adverse reaction. C, control group; E, experimental group; Cs, course; F, female; M, male; I, intervention; XBJ, Xuebijing injection; RDN, Reduning injection; TRQ, Tanreqing injection; WM, Western Medicine; I1, intervention 1; I2, intervention 2; XYP, Xiyanping injection.

Figure 2 Network graph of the outcomes. (A) CRP; (B) PCT; (C) WBC; (D) NE%; (E) IL-6; (F) IL-8; (G) TNF-α. RDN, Reduning injection; WM, Western Medicine; XYP, Xiyanping injection; TRQ, Tanreqing injection; XBJ, Xuebijing injection; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; WBC, white blood cells; NE, neutrophils; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-8, interleukin-8; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Quality evaluation

By using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, the methodological quality of the included RCTs was evaluated. Although all studies reported randomization, only 30 RCTs used a random number table to generate random sequences, which were rated as low risk. A total of 9 studies were classified as “high risk”, because the participants were assigned into each group according to the time of admission in 4 RCTs, according to visiting sequence in 2 RCTs, and according to clinical examination results in 3 RCTs. The risk of the remaining studies was rated as “unclear”, because they only mentioned “randomization” without detailed methods. Selection bias was rated as “unclear risk” since the allocation concealment was not reported in all the included RCTs. The studies did not report blinding, therefore the performance bias was rated as “unclear risk”. Since the assessment of the associated findings from the included RCTs was not impacted by the blinding of outcome evaluators, the detection bias was rated as “low risk”. None of the included RCTs had incomplete data, hence the attrition bias was rated as “low risk”. The reporting bias was rated as “unclear risk” because the whole implementation plan could not be collected. Since no other overt bias was found in any of the included studies, it was rated as “low risk”. A summary of the risk of bias for each included RCT is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3 Risk of bias graph.

Outcome measures

The node-splitting method was used to evaluate the local inconsistency of the outcome measures in a closed loop. The results showed that there was no difference between local direct comparison and indirect comparison (Appendix 2).

CRP

The data on CRP were available in 65 RCTs involving 4 types of CHIs [2008–2011, 13 studies (21-33); 2012–2015, 24 studies (34-57); 2016–2019, 22 studies (58-79); 2000–2022, 6 studies (80-85)]. As shown in Table S1, patients receiving XBJ + WM and TRQ + WM had a significant improvement in CRP compared with those receiving a WM regimen alone [MD and 95% CIs were −4.84 (−9.07 to −0.62), 1.48 (0.74 to 2.23), respectively]. In contrast, compared with using a WM regimen alone, there was no significant change in CRP level in the XYP + WM and RDN + WM groups. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between other interventions and the WM regimen.

PCT

In total, 23 RCTs (36,37,47,53,60,61,63,64,68,70,72,74,75,77,79-82,84-88) involving 4 CHIs were used to analyze the change in PCT. Patients receiving TRQ + WM showed significant improvement in PCT compared to those who received WM alone or XBJ + WM, with MD and 95% CIs of −2.40 (−3.48 to −1.32) and −1.74 (−3.46 to −0.01), respectively (Table S1). There was no statistically significant difference between other interventions and WM regimen.

WBC

A total of 31 RCTs involving 4 CHIs were used to analyze the change in the WBC [2015–2022, 15 studies (34,35,37,38,58-61,67-70,74,77,79); 2006–2014, 16 studies (22,25,26,29,33,41,44,45,49,53,89-94)]. XYP + WM, XBJ + WM, TRQ + WM, and RDN + WM had a significant effect on WBC compared to WM regimen alone, with MD and 95% CIs of −1.92 (−3.64 to −0.20), −1.50 (−1.89 to −1.12), 0.88 (0.47 to 1.29), and 1.95 (1.14 to 2.76), respectively (Table S2). Moreover, XBJ + WM and RDN + WM showed significantly better effects compared with TRQ + WM, with MD and 95% CIs of −0.62 (−1.18 to −0.07) and 1.07 (0.17 to 1.98), respectively.

NE%

A total of 23 RCTs (22,26,27,33-35,38,41,44,49,58,59,61,67,69,74,77,79,89,91-94) involving 4 CHIs were used to analyze the change in the NE%. XYP + WM, XBJ + WM, TRQ + WM, and RDN + WM had a significant effect on NE% compared to the WM regimen alone, with MD and 95% CIs of 4.21 (0.85 to 7.57), 5.59 (3.45 to 7.73), −3.16 (−5.30 to −1.03), and −9.52 (−13.53 to −5.51), respectively (Table S2). Furthermore, RDN + WM showed significantly better effects compared with TRQ + WM and XYP + WM, with MD and 95% CIs of −6.36 (−10.90 to −1.82) and −5.31 (−10.54 to −0.08), respectively.

IL-6

In total, 19 RCTs (53,55,60,65,66,70,71,75,78,82,83,86,95-101) involving 4 CHIs were used to analyze the change in the IL-6. XBJ + WM and TRQ + WM had a significant effect on IL-6 compared to using WM alone, with MD and 95% CIs of −5.62 (−7.93 to −3.32) and 1.96 (1.16 to 2.76), respectively. XBJ + WM and RDN + WM showed significantly better effects compared with XYP + WM, with MD and 95% CIs of 3.92 (0.63 to 7.20) and 4.51 (2.00 to 7.02), respectively (Table S3). XBJ + WM showed significantly better effects compared with TRQ + WM, with MD and 95% CI of −3.66 (−6.10 to −1.22).

IL-8

In total, 22 RCTs (23,24,29,36,53,66,78,80,97-99,101-111) involving 4 CHIs were used to analyze the change in IL-8. Indirect comparisons demonstrated that RDN + WM had a significant effect on the levels of IL-8 compared with TRQ + WM, with MD and 95% CI of −3.01 (−5.23 to −0.79) (Table S3). There was no statistically significant difference between other interventions.

TNF-α

In total, 36 RCTs involving 4 CHIs were used to analyze the change in TNF-α [2015–2022, 19 studies (36,60,65,66,72,76,78,83-85,95-98,102-104,112,113); 2006–2014, 17 studies (25,46,47,51-53,55,99-101,105-110,114)]. XBJ + WM and TRQ + WM had a significant effect on TNF-α level compared with using WM alone, with MD and 95% CIs of −5.59 (−7.65 to −3.52) and 1.69 (1.21 to 2.18), respectively. Moreover, XBJ + WM and RDN + WM showed significantly better effects compared with XYP + WM, with MD and 95% CIs of 4.09 (1.21 to 6.98) and 4.21 (2.05 to 6.37), respectively (Table S4). XBJ + WM showed significantly better effects compared with TRQ + WM, with MD and 95% CI of −3.89 (−6.02 to −1.77). RDN + WM showed significantly better effects compared with XBJ + WM, with MD and 95% CI of 1.01 (0.19 to 1.83).

SUCRA values of CHIs groups for outcome measures

Based on the calculated probabilities (Table 2), XBJ + WM (72.2%) and TRQ + WM (65.1%) showed better outcomes in improving CRP level among all CHI groups. TRQ + WM (82.6%) and XYP + WM (73.9%) demonstrated the best effects on improving PCT. RDN + WM (83.4%) and XYP + WM (75.8%) demonstrated the best effects on improving WBC. RDN + WM (98.2%) and XBJ + WM (68.3%) seemed to be optimal choices for improving the area of NE%. TRQ + WM (85.5%) and XYP + WM (68.4%) presented higher probability in improving IL-6 level. XBJ + WM (79.7%) and TRQ + WM (64.3%) presented higher probability in improving IL-8 level. With regard to TNF-α, TRQ + WM (82.2%) and XYP + WM (64.7%) showed better performance in drug safety. The figures of the cumulative probabilities for outcome measures are listed in Appendix 3.

Table 2

SUCRA values of different groups for outcomes

Treatment CRP PCT WBC NE% IL-6 IL-8 TNF-α
XYP plus WM 49.1% 73.9%* 75.8%* 49.0% 68.4%* 53.5% 64.7%*
XBJ plus WM 72.2%* 32.4% 61.6% 68.3%* 50.8% 79.7%* 60.8%
WM 9.0% 8.5% 0.4% 0.2% 4.7% 15.6% 2.0%
TRQ plus WM 65.1%* 82.6%* 28.8% 34.3% 85.5%* 64.3%* 82.2%*
RDN plus WM 54.7% 52.7% 83.4%* 98.2%* 40.6% 36.9% 40.3%

*, the values indicate the top 2 interventions with higher SUCRAs for different outcomes. SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve; XYP, Xiyanping injection; WM, Western Medicine; XBJ, Xuebijing injection; TRQ, Tanreqing injection; RDN, Reduning injection; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; WBC, white blood cells; NE, neutrophils; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-8, interleukin-8; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Safety

A total of 12 RCTs (39,45,58,63,66,74,78,95,96,102,104,111) provided detailed information on the conditions, and 19 RCTs (22,26,34,41,51,53,54,61,70-72,89,91,92,98,103,105,106,110) reported no adverse reaction. The rest of the included studies did not provide information on any adverse reactions. In addition, the majority of the adverse reactions were resolved after drug withdrawal according to the RCTs. The detailed conditions and cases are presented in Table 3.

Table 3

Details of adverse drug reactions

Adverse events RDN + WM (%) TRQ + WM (%) XBJ + WM (%) XYP + WM (%) WM (%) Total
Dizziness 1 (7.1) 1 (7.1) 2 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 10 (71.4) 14
Headache 0 (0.0) 2 (66.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (33.3) 3
Skin irritation 0 (0.0) 2 (66.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (33.3) 3
Gastrointestinal reaction 0 (0.0) 14 (41.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 20 (58.8) 34
Phlebitis 0 (0.0) 1 (16.7) 3 (50.0) 2 (33.3) 0 (0.0) 6

XBJ, Xuebijing injection; RDN, Reduning injection; TRQ, Tanreqing injection; XYP, Xiyanping injection; WM, Western Medicine.

Publication bias

Stata software was employed to assess publication bias by creating funnel plots. Comparisons between different interventions were demonstrated by different colors. In terms of the CRP, PCT, NE%, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, the funnel plots of 4 outcomes were asymmetrical, suggesting the existence of bias (Figure 4 and Appendix 4). However, the funnel plot of WBC was visually symmetrical, indicating that there was no bias.

Figure 4 Funnel plots of outcomes: (A) CRP; (B) PCT. A, Reduning injection plus Western Medicine; B, Tanreqing injection plus Western Medicine; C, Western Medicine; D, Xuebijing injection plus Western Medicine; E, Xiyanping injection plus Western Medicine; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin.

Discussion

This NMA included 94 RCTs involving 4 CHIs that evaluated the levels of CRP, PCT, WBC, NE%, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and adverse reactions after the application of CHIs combined with RT. According to this NMA, compared with using WM alone, using a combination of CHIs with WM could significantly reduce the level of inflammatory factors in AECOPD. TRQ and XBJ combined with WM could reduce the levels of CRP, WBC, NE%, IL-6, and TNF-α. TRQ combined with RT could decrease the levels of PCT. XYP and RDN combined with WM could reduce the level of WBC and NE%. Based on the SUCRA values, TRQ + WM had the most obvious advantages in decreasing the levels of PCT, IL-6, and TNF-α. XBJ + RT was shown to be the most effective method in decreasing the levels of CRP and IL-8. RDN + WM showed the best effects on reducing the level of WBC and NE%. TRQ + WM showed more obvious therapeutic effects in patients with AECOPD if the improvement in CRP and all other above mentioned outcome measures was taken into account. Besides the efficacy, the safety of CHIs in the treatment of AECOPD warrants considerable attention. However, approximately 68% of included RCTs did not specifically report adverse reactions of using CHIs, leading to a lack of attention to drug safety among clinicians. Further studies are needed to determine the safety of using RDN, XYP, XBJ, and TRQ combined with WM.

Studies have shown that COPD is a systemic inflammatory syndrome, especially in the acute exacerbation stage, with the levels of inflammatory mediators (CRP, PCT, WBC, NE, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) remarkably increased (115-119). These inflammatory mediators participate in the occurrence and development of systemic inflammation in COPD patients. The enhanced inflammatory response is the main pathogenesis of COPD (120). Treatment of AECOPD with the combination of TCM and WM can improve the treatment effect and reduce the level of these inflammatory mediators. As the currently preferred treatment, antibiotics can cause serious drug resistance and adverse reactions, making the alternative treatment of CHIs combined with WM more attractive. RDN consists of Artemislae annuae herba, Lonicerae japonicae flos, and Gardenia fructus. Xuebijing injection is composed of 5 TCM extracts including Flos Carthami, Ligusticum striatum, Paeonia lactiflora, Angelica sinensis, and Salvia miltiorriza. The components of TRQ are Scutellariae radix, bear bile powder, Saigae tataricae cornu, Lonicerae japonicae flos, and Forsythiae fructus. XYP is mainly constituted by andrographolide sulfonate. Modern studies have shown that these 4 CHIs have anti-inflammatory effects (121-124). These results indicate that clinicians can consider using WM + CHI to reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in AECOPD patients, and then improving clinical efficacy.

This NMA compared the efficacy of using different CHIs combined with WM and using WM alone, and indirectly evaluated the efficacy of various CHIs + WM in the treatment of AECOPD. The objective evaluation in this study provides new insight for choosing optimal CHIs in AECOPD treatment. However, this NMA had several limitations. First, the quality of the included RCTs was general. Only 30 RCTs described the method of generating random sequences such as using a random number table, which led to an overstated therapeutic effect and poor reliability of the data. Second, because all the included RCTs were carried out among a Chinese population, our findings might not be applicable to other races and regions. Third, the funnel plots of 4 outcomes (CRP, PCT, NE%, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) were asymmetrical, suggesting the existence of bias. This may be because the WM treatment was not sufficiently elaborated in original literatures, including information on drug dosage and delivery. This prevents us from conducting subgroup analyses for various WM treatment strategies. Therefore, the specific medication and dosage of WM should be recorded in detail, to increase the credibility of the evidence-based evidence when conducting RCTs on using CHI combined with WM in treating AECOPD. It is recommended that clinical trials must focus more on raising the level of methodological quality. Despite the above limitations, our NMA offered a comprehensive assessment of the therapeutic effects on inflammatory factors of several CHI for AECOPD.


Conclusions

In conclusion, this NMA showed that using CHIs combined with WM could significantly reduce the level of inflammatory factors in AECOPD. A combination of TRQ and WM may be a relatively prior adjuvant therapy option for AECOPD treatment considering its effects in reducing the levels of the anti-inflammatory mediators.


Acknowledgments

Funding: The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82074399).


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the PRISMA reporting checklist. Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-402/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-402/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-402/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2022 report. Available online: https://goldcopd.org/gold-reports/. Accessed 2021-11-15.
  2. Adeloye D, Chua S, Lee C, et al. Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health 2015;5:020415. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Wang C, Xu J, Yang L, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China (the China Pulmonary Health [CPH] study): a national cross-sectional study. Lancet 2018;391:1706-17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Fang L, Gao P, Bao H, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: a nationwide prevalence study. Lancet Respir Med 2018;6:421-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Yang G, Wang Y, Zeng Y, et al. Rapid health transition in China, 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013;381:1987-2015. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. MacLeod M, Papi A, Contoli M, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation fundamentals: Diagnosis, treatment, prevention and disease impact. Respirology 2021;26:532-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Mathioudakis AG, Janssens W, Sivapalan P, et al. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of diagnostic biomarkers and treatable traits. Thorax 2020;75:520-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Bourbeau J, Aaron SD, Barnes NC, et al. Evaluating the risk of pneumonia with inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: Retrospective database studies have their limitations SA. Respir Med 2017;123:94-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Cazzola M, Page CP, Rogliani P, et al. β2-agonist therapy in lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:690-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Jiang M, Jiao Y, Wang Y, et al. Quantitative profiling of polar metabolites in herbal medicine injections for multivariate statistical evaluation based on independence principal component analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e105412. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Wang M, Liu CX, Dong RR, et al. Safety evaluation of chinese medicine injections with a cell imaging-based multiparametric assay revealed a critical involvement of mitochondrial function in hepatotoxicity. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:379586. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Feng CN, Hu HY, Ji ZC, et al. Clinical trials and evaluation of Chinese patent medicine for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica 2022;47:2351-7.
  13. Li YH, Zhu W, Zhou XM. Meta-analysis on Effect of Xuebijing Injection on Inflammatory Index and Immune Function in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae 2021;27:188-95.
  14. Peng Z, Zhu HJ, Ding BH, et al. Meta-analysis of Xiyanping Injection in treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Evaluation Research 2020;43:2534-41.
  15. Leng JY, Lv J, Zhi YJ, et al. A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Tanreqing Injection on Serum Inflammatory Factors in AECOPD Patients. World Chinese Medicine 2020;15:3424-33.
  16. Duan XJ, Wu JR, Wang KH, et al. Meta-analysis of Reduning Injection in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology 2018;27:14-20.
  17. (GOLD). GIfCOLD. Global strategy for the diagnosis management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2015. Available online: https://gold copd.org/goldreports/
  18. Tian J, Li L, Yang K. The realization of network Meta analysis of frequency statistics method in STATA software. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr 2014;9:472-4.
  19. Cope S, Jansen JP. Quantitative summaries of treatment effect estimates obtained with network meta-analysis of survival curves to inform decision-making. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:147. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Salanti G, Dias S, Welton NJ, et al. Evaluating novel agent effects in multiple-treatments meta-regression. Stat Med 2010;29:2369-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang N, Yu D, Sun HM, et al. Effect of Reduning Injection on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Medical Information 2011;24:293-4.
  22. Ying LB, editor. Clinical observation of Tanreqing Injection on 32 cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute exacerbation stage. The first "Zhijiang Chinese medicine forum" and the 2011 academic annual meeting of Zhejiang society of traditional Chinese Medicine; 2011; Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  23. Wang XJ. Effect of Xuebijing Injection on serum IL-8 level in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease The Chinese and foreign health abstract 2011;08:49-50.
  24. Wang XH, Liu XJ. Clinical observation on 39 cases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy 2011;17:29-32.
  25. Chen YQ, Gong BL, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of Xuebijing on Patients with Acute Exacerbation Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chinese General Practice 2011;14:550-3.
  26. Chen XY. Clinical observation of Tanreqing Injection on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [Master]: Fujian University of traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;
  27. Chen DY, Li NJ, Cai BL. Effect of Xuebijing Injection on serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein in acute stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;33:491-3.
  28. Hao TP, Liang FY, Lu YR. Clinical Observation of Xuebijing treating Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2010;28:2232-3.
  29. Feng ZJ, Teng W. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on the expression of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-8 and IL-17 in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. China & Foreign Medical Treatment 2010;29:83-4.
  30. Yin SQ. L. B, Qian YQ. Clinical Value of C-reactive Protein in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Treatment Analysis. China Modern Doctor 2009;47:93-4.
  31. Luo GW, Sun JM, Mao XM. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on C-reactive protein in acute exacerbation of COPD of phlegm heat dampness type. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2009;18:1954-5.
  32. Du XH, Zhang LY, Wang H. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on pulmonary function and inflammatory factors in patients with AECOPD. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2009;18:1952-3, 75.
  33. Peng YQ, Mao YM, Zhu JQ, et al. A clinical study of short-term Xuebijing injection on treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care 2008;15.
  34. Wang XQ. Application of Xuebijing injection in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Practical Clinical Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 2015;15:18-9.
  35. Wang TB. Treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with Tanreqing Injection Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine 2015;42.
  36. Wang P, Zeng YL. Effect of Xuebijing on serum inflammatory mediators and oxidation / antioxidation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine 2015;32:818-20.
  37. Luo L, Pan L. Effect of Xuebijing Injection on systemic inflammatory response and immune function in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute exacerbation stage. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care 2015:173-7.
  38. Li C, Xing LH. Clinical effect of Xuebijing on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Medical Information 2015;28:221.
  39. Zhou JG. Clinical observation of Reduning Injection in treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease 2014;22:83-4.
  40. Zhang X, Wang Y, Guo AX. Effects of Xiyanping on inflammatory factors and pulmonary function in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Clinical Medicine of China 2014;30:932-5.
  41. Zhang H, He CX, Zhang XY. Therapeutic effect of Xiyanping Injection on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Science and Technology 2014:220-.
  42. Yue YX. Effect evaluation of Reduning Injection on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology 2014:204-.
  43. Yan ZH. Therapeutic effect of Tanreqing Injection on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Medical Forum 2014;18:2063-4.
  44. Mu L. Clinical observation of Xuebijing Injection on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use 2014;7.
  45. Li LL, Xue QL, Xiang BL, et al. Clinical observation of Tanreqing adjuvant therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute attack stage. Journal of Ningxia Medical University 2014;36:204-6.
  46. Tang ZW. Effect of Xuebijing injection in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine 2013;18:1414-5.
  47. Nie HY, Xiao L, Xu DL. Reduning injection reduces serum levels of CRP,PCT and TNF-αin Patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Medical Journal of West China 2013;25:1797-9.
  48. Ma HM, Xing YP, Xu F. Clinical observation of Tanreqing Injection in treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease For all Health 2013;7:29-30.
  49. Lu JS, Li Q, Zhao WX, et al. Clinical observation of Tanreqing Injection on blood gas analysis, blood routine and C-reactive protein in patients with lung syndrome of phlegm heat stagnation Clinical Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2013;25:29-30.
  50. Li HJ. Clinical observation on treatment of AECOPD with Tanreqing Injection. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2013;22:1021.
  51. Chen SG. Efficacy of Reduning Injection for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospitals of China 2013;13:454-6.
  52. Zhang XM. Effect of Xuebijing Injection on serum inflammatory factors in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Journal of Clinical Research 2012;29.
  53. Sun GX, Luo YL, Zhang Q, et al. Clinical Observation for Reduning Injection in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Guide of China Medicine 2012;10:11-3.
  54. Shi P. Clinical observation of Tanreqing Injection in treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2012;21:1140-1.
  55. Peng D. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on plasma cytokines and C-reactive protein in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Hainan Medical Journal 2012;23:107-8.
  56. Long H. Clinical observation on treatment of 124 cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute exacerbation stage with Tanreqing Injection. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2012;21:966.
  57. Li Q, Lian B, Liu WJ. Effects of Xuebijing Injection on pulmonary function and C-reactive protein in AECOPD. Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine 2012:107.
  58. Xiu CX, Wang LY, Liu YQ, et al. To Observe the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Reduning Injection in Treating Patients with Phlegm-heat Stagnation of Lung Syndrome in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. World Latest Medicine Information 2019;19:56-7.
  59. Fang XY. Therapeutic Effect of Tanreqing Injection on Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine 2019;33:40-3.
  60. Zhang XL, Pang J. Comparative observation of clinical efficacy of Xiyanping and Xuebijing in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature 2018;5:171-2.
  61. Yang C, Tong JB, Fang L, et al. Clinical observation on Reduning Injection in treating patients with phlegm heat stagnation syndrome in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine 2018;23:1142-4.
  62. Mo DJ, Ma YL, Liu M, et al. To Observe the Clinical Effect of Intravenous Drip of Tanreqing Injection in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Smart Healthcare 2018;4:124-5.
  63. Li ZH. Effect of Tanreqing Injection in the Treatment of 45 Cases of Acute COPD Patients and its Effects on Patients' Pulmonary Function and PCT Level. Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine 2018;14:200-1.
  64. Li WJ. Effect of adjunctive therapy of Tanreqing on patients with exacerbation of COPD and its influence on serum CRP and PCT. Journal of North Pharmacy 2018;15:5-6.
  65. Chen D, Gao LJ, Gao C, et al. Effects of Xuebijing Injection on inflammatory factors and hypersensitive C-reactive protein in AECOPD. Journal of Huaihai Medicine 2018;36:200-2.
  66. Zhang ZG, Zhang ZH, Zhang LL, et al. Comparative Study of Clinical Effect on AECOPD between Tanreqing Injection and Xiyanping Injection. Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease 2017;25:69-72.
  67. Xu LM. Application of Xuebijing injection in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature 2017;4:2600-1.
  68. Xi R, Zhang ZY, Zhang L, et al. Study of Influence of Xuebijing Injection on CPIS Scores and Inflammatory Markers and Immune Function of Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2017;35:1240-2.
  69. Wang YY, Wang LY, Deng XB, et al. Clinical Efficacy of Tanreqing Injection in Treating Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. China Pharmaceuticals 2017;26:46-8.
  70. Wang N. Clinical observation of Xuebijing in treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with phlegm and blood stasis [Master]: Liaoning University of traditional Chinese Medicine 2017;
  71. Liang Y, Chen SN, Li RX. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on hs CRP, IL-6 and IL-10 in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine 2017;20:11-3.
  72. Li GR. Clinical effect of Tanreqing Injection on acute attack of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its influence on the level of inflammatory factors in peripheral blood of patients. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use 2017;10:55-7.
  73. Dong Q. Evaluation of tanreqing injection in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proceeding of Clinical Medicine 2017;26:13-6.
  74. Wu NN, Zhang Y, Li MX. Clinical effect of Tanreqing Injection on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use 2016;9:80-2.
  75. Shen WJ, Li F, Xiao H, et al., editors. Effects of Xuebijing Injection on inflammatory markers and cellular immune function in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Proceedings of the first National Conference on severe neurology and the 2016 academic annual meeting of the severe medical professional committee of Hunan Medical Association; 2016.
  76. Ma XM, Zhao HT, Chen G. Effect of Xuebijing on pulmonary function and tumor necrosis factor in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- α Effect of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein Journal of Practical Medical Techniques 2016;23:67-8.
  77. Li Y. Clinical Observation of Xuebijing Injection on Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Acute Exacerbation. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae 2016;22:188-91.
  78. Hu XL, Dai XB, Ke ZH, et al. Comparison of Tanreqing and Xuebijing in treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drugs & Clinic 2016;31:1732-6.
  79. Hou HJ, Zhang WY, Zhang ZH, et al. Clinical observation of Xiyanping injection in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Hebei North University (Natural Science Edition) 2016;32:23-4, 6.
  80. Liu XY, Yu WN, He MY, et al. Observation of Tanreqing Injection on Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Phlegm-heat Obstructing Lung Type. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese 2022;31:497-500.
  81. Fan LZ, Xiong JQ, Yu J. Effect of Tanreqing on procalcitonin and T lymphocyte subsets in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. China Modern Medicine 2022;29:48-51.
  82. Tang H. Effect of Reduning Injection on inflammatory factors and lung function in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Shanxi Medical Journal 2021;50:257-60.
  83. Huang JX, Zhao DY, Bao SD. Clinical observation of Tanreqing Injection in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure. Modern Medicine and Health Research Electronic Journal 2021;5:50-3.
  84. Yu Y, Ou YL, Yang XL, et al. Effects of Phlegmyheatclear Treatment on the Symptoms, Blood gas, Lung Function and serum Inflammatory Factors Levels of AECOPD Patients. Progress in Modern Biomedicine 2020;20:897-900.
  85. Wang B, Wang HQ, Li TH, et al. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on patients with acute attack of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Women's Health Research 2020:100-1.
  86. Ren XS. Clinical effect and mechanism of Tanreqing injection on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. China Practical Medicine 2021;16:7-10.
  87. Qian LH, Hu QX. Effect of Tanreqing injection on serum procalcitonin,blood gas analysis and lung function index in AECOPD Patients. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use 2020;13:16-7.
  88. Qiu J. Curative observation of Xuebijing Injection on patients in acute exacerbation period of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure. Drug Evaluation Research 2013;36:206-9.
  89. Qian YR, Song YQ. Clinical analysis of Xiyanping combined therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Frontiers of Medicine 2013:63.
  90. Bai S. Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Xuebijing Injection Used for Treatment of Acute Attack of Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Heilongjiang Medicine Journal 2013;26:1187-8.
  91. Xie J. Clinical analysis of Tanreqing in treating 40 cases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine 2011;20:366.
  92. Ma L, Li XD, Zhang HX. Clinical treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly at acute exacerbation stage. Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease 2011;19:466-7.
  93. Xu BS. Anti inflammatory and immune effects of Tanreqing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials 2010;33:483-5.
  94. Zhang Y, Li YQ, Wang G, et al., editors. A randomized controlled trial of Tanreqing Injection in treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The 12th academic exchange conference of lung diseases in internal medicine of Chinese Academy of traditional Chinese Medicine; 2006; Xining, Qinghai, China.
  95. Shi XL, Feng SZ, Zhang LF. Clinical effect of Xuebijing injection in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use 2022;15:30-2+6.
  96. Ma XM. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on pulmonary function and levels of inflammatory factors in patients with acute attack of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Women's Health Research 2022.
  97. Peng QH, Liu Q, Liu CG, et al. Clinical effect of Reduning injection in treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its effect on the Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor-kappa B inflammatory signaling pathway. Hunan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2021;37:1-4, 20.
  98. Chen H, Deng ZX, Du YJ, et al. Effects of Tanreqing Injection Combined with Budesonide on Pulmonary Function and Serum Inflammatory Cytokines in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2019;28:1050-3.
  99. Wang XZ, Shi HF. DIng YP. The Study on Efficacy of Xuebijing in Treatment of Patients with AECOPD. Journal of Basic Chinese Medicine 2009;15:771-2.
  100. Li Y. Clinical observation on atomization inhalation of Tanreqing Injection in treating acute exacerbation of COPD of phlegm heat dampness type. Journal of Sichuan of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2008:56-7.
  101. Xu CQ. Influence of Tankeqing Injection on Plasma Cytokine and Lung Faction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chinese Journal of General Practice 2006:401-2.
  102. Feng HX, Zhang YF, Wang CN. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on Toll-Like Receptor and Downstream Cytokines in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chinese Journal of Rational Drug Use 2020;17:43-7.
  103. Xu WJ, Liu Q, Sun XJ, et al. Effect of atomization inhalation of Tanreqing Injection on sputum inflammatory mediators in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2019;28:1638-40.
  104. Pan Y, Fu XH, Gao JZ, et al. Effect of Tanreqing injection combined with basic therapy on AECOPD and its influence on serum cytokines. Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy 2015;21:66-9.
  105. Yang WZ, Zou LK, Deng ZT, et al. Analysis of the effect of Tanreqing Injection on 120 elderly patients with AECOPD. Guangxi Medical Journal 2014;36:1804-5.
  106. Xu YF, Jiang SJ. Effect of Reduning Injection on 15 cases of AECOPD. Shandong Medical Journal 2011;51:32-3.
  107. Wei SZ, Chen SN, Feng Y. Effect of Tanreqing Injection on cytokines and lung function in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine 2011;20:1402-3.
  108. Li W, Li GL, He XQ, et al. Effects of Tanreqing injection on immune factors in induced sputum from patients with acute period of COPD. Journal of Medical Forum 2011;32:6-8.
  109. Chen WX, Deng YC. Effect of integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on inflammatory cytokines and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy 2011;17:28-9.
  110. Xu YF. Clinical value of Reduning Injection in the treatment of AECOPD [Master]: Shandong University; 2010.
  111. Yang YH. Clinical observation of Tanreqing Injection in treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its effect on IL-8 in peripheral blood [Master]: Fujian College of traditional Chinese Medicine 2008;
  112. Li J, Xiao R. The application value of Tanreqing injection in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Contemporary Medicine 2021;27:119-20.
  113. Li LW, Li Q. Effects of Xuebijing injection combined with conventional western medicine on vascular endothelial function and inflammatory factors in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2017;39:26-8.
  114. Fu ZB, Zhong S, Zhu T. Xuebijing injection decreases the serum levels of TNF-α and inhibits the activation of HIF-1α in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Medical Journal of West China 2014;26:1601-3.
  115. Barnes PJ. Inflammatory endotypes in COPD. Allergy 2019;74:1249-56. [PubMed]
  116. Mathioudakis AG, Chatzimavridou-Grigoriadou V, Corlateanu A, et al. Procalcitonin to guide antibiotic administration in COPD exacerbations: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2017;26:160073. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  117. Vashist SK, Venkatesh AG, Marion Schneider E, et al. Bioanalytical advances in assays for C-reactive protein. Biotechnol Adv 2016;34:272-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  118. Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, et al. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1128-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  119. Thomsen M, Ingebrigtsen TS, Marott JL, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers and exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA 2013;309:2353-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  120. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:557-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  121. Han XX, Tian YG, Liu XF, et al. Network pharmacology combined with pharmacodynamics revealed the anti-inflammatory mechanism of Tanreqing capsule against acute-exacerbation chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sci Rep 2022;12:13967. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  122. Zhao Z, Hu SX, Guan JF, et al. Systematic review and sequential analysis of Xuebijing Injection in treatment of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2021;46:3980-9. [PubMed]
  123. Xie F, Xie M, Yang Y, et al. Assessing the Anti-inflammatory Mechanism of Reduning Injection by Network Pharmacology. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:6134098. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  124. Yang QW, Li Q, Zhang J, et al. Crystal structure and anti-inflammatory and anaphylactic effects of andrographlide sulphonate E in Xiyanping, a traditional Chinese medicine injection. J Pharm Pharmacol 2019;71:251-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]

(English Language Editor: J. Jones)

Cite this article as: Zhu X, Meng X, Lei N, Shen Z, Li X, Song H, Feng Q, Guo Y. Chinese herbal injections plus Western Medicine on inflammatory factors for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2023;15(4):1901-1918. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-402

Download Citation