@article{JTD6333,
author = {Kevin Phan and Dong-Fang Zhao and Nelson Wang and Ya Ruth Huo and Marco Di Eusanio and Tristan D. Yan},
title = {Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review},
journal = {Journal of Thoracic Disease},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
year = {2016},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation for degenerated aortic bioprostheses has emerged as a promising alternative to redo conventional aortic valve replacement (cAVR). However there are concerns surrounding the efficacy and safety of VIV. This systematic review aims to compare the outcomes and safety of transcatheter VIV implantation with redoes cAVR. Six databases were systematically searched. A total of 18 relevant studies (823 patients) were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated VIV achieved significant improvements in mean gradient (38 mmHg preoperatively to 15.2 mmHg postoperatively, P},
issn = {2077-6624}, url = {https://jtd.amegroups.org/article/view/6333}
}