Significance of chest ultrasound in the early postoperative period following thoracic surgery
Editorial

Significance of chest ultrasound in the early postoperative period following thoracic surgery

Thomas G. Lesser

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Teaching Hospital of the University Hospital of Jena, Gera, Germany

Correspondence to: Thomas G. Lesser. Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Straße des Friedens 122, 07548 Gera, Germany. Email: thomas.lesser@wkg.srh.de.

Provenance: This is an invited Editorial commissioned by the Section Editor Shuangjiang Li (Department of Thoracic Surgery and West China Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China).

Comment on: Chiappetta M, Meacci E, Cesario A, et al. Postoperative chest ultrasound findings and effectiveness after thoracic surgery: A pilot study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018;44:1960-7.


Submitted Nov 26, 2018. Accepted for publication Dec 13, 2018.

doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.110


In internal medicine, thoracic and lung ultrasound is used to diagnose pleural masses/fluid collections, for staging lung cancer, for excluding pneumothorax and pulmonary edema, and for diagnosing pulmonary embolisms (1,2). The value of lung ultrasound in emergency and intensive care medicine also has been estimated increasingly over the last years (3,4). Although there are well-known limitations caused by the air-containing lung, this method can successfully visualize solid nodules and lung consolidations that are just below the pleura as long as no pneumothorax is present. Chest ultrasound also has a high accuracy and is superior to the chest X-ray for the diagnosis of pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and lung consolidation (5).

In thoracic surgery, the timely detection of postoperative complications is difficult due to the absence or late presentation of clinical symptoms. The chest tube can be used for diagnosis, but may be insufficient due to obstructions from clotted blood. In postoperative cases with complications, chest X-ray frequently reveals a partial or complete opacification of the hemithorax such that it is not possible to distinguish between hemothorax, pleural effusion, obstructive atelectasis, and pneumonia. In contrast, sonography is capable of determining the cause of opacification; various causes of lung consolidation, including pneumonia, compression, and obstructive atelectasis, are easily distinguished by ultrasound (3,6).

We systematically use ultrasound intraoperatively during video-assisted thoracoscopy and thoracotomy (7). Intraoperative ultrasound provides important information regarding tumor localization and tumor infiltration in adjacent structures, such as vessels. Furthermore, endothoracic sonography improves the estimation of operability in locally advanced lung cancer (8). Intraoperative ultrasound is therefore an important tool in determining the operative strategy, including the resection amount, thereby increasing the safety of the operation.

For incomprehensible reasons, however, chest ultrasound has not gained prominence as an important diagnostic tool following thoracic surgery; for example, only a few studies have evaluated the use of chest ultrasound for the postoperative management of chest tubes. One prior study reported that ultrasound has a 100% negative predictive value for pneumothorax, and therefore can predict the safe removal of chest tubes without the need for routine X-rays (9). Recently, we showed that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for atypical lung resection without a chest tube is safe. A prerequisite was the postoperative chest ultrasound. These findings therefore suggest that the diagnostic function of the chest tube during the postoperative period can be replaced by chest ultrasound.

For the first time, Chiappetta et al. (10) have evaluated the effectiveness of chest ultrasound after thoracic surgery compared to chest X-ray. They tested whether a postoperative chest ultrasound was sufficient, or if X-ray was additionally needed for a better evaluation. Chest X-rays were required in only 5 of their 24 cases; in the remaining 19 cases, chest ultrasound was considered sufficient and effective, and increased the diagnostic accuracy of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and lung consolidation. One of the major strengths of chest ultrasound in this study was the ability to discriminate between obstructive and post-hypoventilation atelectasis by analyzing the bronchogram during recruitment maneuvers. Chest ultrasound was considered sufficient, especially in minimal invasive thoracic surgery. The major limitation of postoperative ultrasound examination in this study was the inability to find a sound window in the case of massive subcutaneous emphysema.

Despite the utility of chest ultrasound, it is important to assess ultrasound findings within the clinical context, especially with respect to therapeutic need. For example, a small pneumothorax or pleural effusion, which is only detectable by ultrasound, has no clinical significance in the early postoperative period. It is important to be cautious, therefore, of overtreatment based on ultrasound findings. The main advantage of chest ultrasound in the postoperative period is the early diagnosis of relevant bleeding in cases of an insufficient chest tube. Chest ultrasound also has the advantage of discriminating between obstructive atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy and pleural effusion requiring a chest tube correction. As a final note of caution, despite improvements in diagnosis due to ultrasound, it remains important to also conduct physical examinations, including lung auscultations, during the postoperative period, as auscultation can provide the earliest evidence of atelectasis formation.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Mathis G. Bildatlas der Lungen- und Pleurasonografie. Springer, 2001.
  2. Kroegel C, Reißig A. Transthorakale Sonographie. Grundlagen und Anwendung. Stuttgart New York: Georg ThiemeVerlag, 2000.
  3. Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:577-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Lichtenstein DA. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Ann Intensive Care 2014;4:1. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Xirouchaki N, Magkanas E, Vaporidi K, et al. Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography. Intensive Care Med 2011;37:1488-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Koegelenberg CF, von Groote-Bidlingmaier F, Bolliger CT. Transthoracic ultrasonography for the respiratory physician. Respiration 2012;84:337-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Lesser TG. Significance of Thoracic and Lung Ultrasound in Thoracic Surgery. Ultraschall Med 2017;38:592-610. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Lesser TG. Endothoracic sonography improves the estimation of operability in locally advanced lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:217-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Soult MC, Collins JN, Novosel TJ, et al. Thoracic ultrasound can predict safe removal of thoracostomy tubes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;77:256-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Chiappetta M, Meacci E, Cesario A, et al. Postoperative chest ultrasound findings and effectiveness after thoracic surgery: A pilot study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018;44:1960-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Lesser TG. Significance of chest ultrasound in the early postoperative period following thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2019;11(Suppl 3):S352-S353. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.110

Download Citation